This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Ted's cell
Um..couldn't this be the same place they held Sylar? Heroe 10:50, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- they blatantly are the same cells. --Frantik (Talk) 11:01, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- They are the same sets. Whether or not they're the same cells can't be confirmed.--Hardvice (talk) 15:49, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- Indeed.. we don't even know if that was Ted in the cell.. it could have been a shapeshifting hero.. sure he looked in every way perfectly identical to Ted and even the same actor was used, but we just can't confirm it.. --Frantik (Talk) 19:19, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- There's no need to be obnoxious about it. Other than the fact that it's the same set, there's simply no reason to assume it's the same cell. It takes no more effort to say it might be than to say it is. Why risk being wrong? Lots of things on this show are obvious, but obvious isn't the same as "confirmed". Why should this use any lower standard than any other uncertain information?--Hardvice (talk) 19:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- I'm just confused why only in this case is the same set not assumed to be the same location. When you have two pages, it implies that they are assumed not to be the same location. Imo, there should be a note on the combined page saying they might not be the same location, not the other way around. --Frantik (Talk) 19:49, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- I had the same arguments. However, when I added Ted's info to Sylar's cell, I was told that we should distinguish between the two. I nominated that we make a neutral article that doesn't depend on "whose" cell it is, but at the insistence of some of the admin, I made this one. Refer to Talk:Sylar's cell--Baldbobbo 20:30, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- I'm just confused why only in this case is the same set not assumed to be the same location. When you have two pages, it implies that they are assumed not to be the same location. Imo, there should be a note on the combined page saying they might not be the same location, not the other way around. --Frantik (Talk) 19:49, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- There's no need to be obnoxious about it. Other than the fact that it's the same set, there's simply no reason to assume it's the same cell. It takes no more effort to say it might be than to say it is. Why risk being wrong? Lots of things on this show are obvious, but obvious isn't the same as "confirmed". Why should this use any lower standard than any other uncertain information?--Hardvice (talk) 19:35, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- Indeed.. we don't even know if that was Ted in the cell.. it could have been a shapeshifting hero.. sure he looked in every way perfectly identical to Ted and even the same actor was used, but we just can't confirm it.. --Frantik (Talk) 19:19, 27 February 2007 (EST)
- They are the same sets. Whether or not they're the same cells can't be confirmed.--Hardvice (talk) 15:49, 27 February 2007 (EST)