This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Category talk:Characters with The Mark
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase t)? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)
- Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on the mark?--Hardvice (talk) 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)
- I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)
- ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in The Mark, but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to Claude's old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --Orne 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)
- Good point. But we should still change it to "the Mark". I'll take care of that now. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)
- ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in The Mark, but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to Claude's old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --Orne 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)
- I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)