User talk:Josh

Hello, Josh

Help
General Help Characters Editing Layout Naming conventions Sources Style
Special Topics Caching Collapsible tables Consensus checks Disambiguation Images Int'l characters Interviews Quotes Portals Signatures Spoilers Tables of contents Templates Theories
For more help... Contact an administrator Admin Level Radicell RyanGibsonStewart Or leave a message Administrator Portal

Welcome to Heroes Wiki!

Here are a few links to get you started:

• If you are new to Heroes, you might want to start at the New User Portal.
• If you're not too familiar with editing Wikis, you might like to start with Help:Editing.
• If you already are familiar with wikiediting, you might want to try Help:Style.
• If you're ready to get started, Template:Todo lists some ways you can help out.
• Of course, if you have your own idea for a new article, that's great, too.
• Recent Changes will let you see others' contributions as they happen.
  • To make Recent Changes more useful for all users, remember to provide an edit summary in the Summary field before you save your changes.
  • You can set the Wiki to prompt you for a summary in your preferences.
• When posting on an article's Talk page you should add ~~~~ or click the signature button.
  • This will add a signature and timestamp to the end of your comment so others can easily tell who posted it.
  • When editing normal article pages, don't sign your contributions.
• If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to leave a message for an administrator.
• You can also customize your user page if you like.

Once again, welcome to Heroes Wiki!

---

Exposed future overhaul

Thanks. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:53, 17 October 2008 (EDT)

D'oh

I'm sorry; I completely missed that it was Future Peter's exposed list. So used to fixing (present) Peter's template when people add those. GabrielPetrelli 16:29, 7 November 2008 (EST)

Ishi Nakamura

• FYI, I did thought of the idea right before I found the image on the spoiler pages. And as you can even see, Ishi doesn't even look like she's using her ability in the image, she looks more like she's about to hug Hiro.
  • And additionally, I already removed the spoiler part of the theory, what more do you want? --NiveKJ13 18:55, 8 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks

Thanks for helping clean up the edits by Smakenverschillen, he has put something on your talk page (but I can't find it). :) --Irony 15:00, 15 January 2009 (EST)

• Dont worry i found it.What a jerk Gabriel Bishop 15:27, 15 January 2009 (EST) Gabriel Bishop

Re:Theory confusion

Present Peter not having illusion is a plus cause future Peter had, and since the theories are about Peter when he could mimic abilities, like a past Peter, him losing the abilities doesn't change the fact he could have absorbed powers from characters in a certain moment in the past. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 18:10, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Peter not displaying healing should be kept because while his earliest manifestation was his mother's power, he was exposed to healing, and we all know he had powers he never used cause he never learned about them. About the illusion and Candice thing, my bad, I was so concerned about catching up with the edits made that something slipped by while I was speed reading. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 18:43, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Moved from User:Josh

so where would i find the tab to sign it. havent seen it yet or just missed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DirtyJoe (talk • contribs) 17:35, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Mohinder and Enhanced strength.

Yes, Mohinder retained the enhanced strength. But it wasn't simply enhanced strength to begin with. To begin with it was an entirely different ability with other effects. It wasn't until Dual and Mohinder's exposure to the compete formula that his ability was solely enhanced strength. That's why Mohinder's enhanced strength was documented as it was. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

• I see that. However, to have the page written as you had it would be going against a precedent (established in piece meal here under my comment, here, from here down and a few other places), the precedent being that we do not list ability byproducts (that is, secondary aspects of abilties). Consensus was that the old ability was one ability, not a bunch of separate ones in one person. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2009 (EDT)