Talk:The Company/Season One

The history here needs a lot of work for grammar and style (particularly perspective and person). One consistent problem I've seen throughout is a problem with antecedents. For example, the Genesis history read "After getting his father's old taxi driver job, Mr. Bennet takes a ride in his taxi." Mr. Bennet did not get his father's old taxi job--Mohinder did.

The paragraphs should also be broken with two carriage returns instead of <br> tags.--Hardvice (talk) 12:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

• Thanks for catching the errors, Hardvice. I was mainly just trying to summarize as much as possible when I wrote it and wasn't giving that much attention. I'll try to keep note of the style for the future.--MiamiVolts (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Move

• Do we want to use subpages or a pseudonamespace? In other words, should this be "The Company/Season 1" or "Season One:The Company"? I think we should keep all of the season one histories in a category together, so there's some appeal to the pseudonamespace. Subpages make a lot of sense, too, but they're not the most natural things to which to link. In any case, I think we should go for a simpler subpage name (like "The Company/Season 1" instead of "The Company/history (season 1)") to make links easier.--Hardvice (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
• Either "Season One:The Company" or "The Company/Season 1" make sense. I prefer "Season One:The Company". — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
  • I like "The Company/Season 1" better, or even "The Company/season 1" (lowercase). "Season One:The Company" would be okay, but it makes it sound too much like The Company is the name of an episode instead of a group history.--MiamiVolts (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
  • I personally like the pseudonamespaces. I contemplated the same thing for the timelines, and decided that subpages clutters the name a bit. Something about the backslash, I don't know.--Bob 16:41, 21 May 2007 (EDT)