User talk:Ice Vision
Hello, Ice Vision
| Help | |
|---|---|
| General Help | |
| Special Topics | |
| For more help...
Contact an administrator Or leave a message | |
Welcome to Heroes Wiki!
Here are a few links to get you started:
- If you are new to Heroes, you might want to start at the New User Portal.
- If you're not too familiar with editing Wikis, you might like to start with Help:Editing.
- If you already are familiar with wikiediting, you might want to try Help:Style.
- If you're ready to get started, Template:Todo lists some ways you can help out.
- Of course, if you have your own idea for a new article, that's great, too.
- Recent Changes will let you see others' contributions as they happen.
- To make Recent Changes more useful for all users, remember to provide an edit summary in the Summary field before you save your changes.
- You can set the Wiki to prompt you for a summary in your preferences.
- When posting on an article's Talk page you should add ~~~~ or click the signature button.
- This will add a signature and timestamp to the end of your comment so others can easily tell who posted it.
- When editing normal article pages, don't sign your contributions.
- If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to leave a message for an administrator.
- You can also customize your user page if you like.
Once again, welcome to Heroes Wiki!
Hi Ice Vision. Welcome to the wiki. I see you have started adding some interesting stuff s well as some much needed clarification. What I notce, though, is that you don't write a comment on what you changed for the changelogs. Here at HeroesWiki we tend not to comment for the talk pages, but when editing the actual articles, it really helps if ou make a note of what you changed. It needen't be ong, eg +sp for spelling corrections, but it really helps when looking over the changes. Take cre, and keep the changes coming. -- Cuardin 01:33, 24 January 2007 (EST)
Theories
When adding preposterous and nonsensical theories to the theories articles in some kind of misguided attempt to make a point, can you please make sure to follow the actual set-up of the columns? Only citations to specific scenes from episodes or graphic novels belong in the "Citations" columns. Base speculation and non-canon evidence belong in "Notes". Thanks!--Hardvice (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Is there something more than trolling to the bizarre and unsubstantiated "theories" you are posting? --Ted C 17:41, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
You need to specify this more clearly. The point of providing evidence is to be specific. Regardless, for you to post two theories contradictory to each other really doesn't add to the validity of any of your claims. --Bob 19:35, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
Mr. Muggles
- Hi, Ice Vision. The link you added as evidence that Mr. Muggles has a power isn't really appropriate evidence since it's just a fan created page so saying that The Company has a file on him is inaccurate. Thanks! (Admin 14:04, 4 April 2007 (EDT))
Theories editing
The formatting you undid is agreed upon and setup by the admins. Do not remove this for no apparent reason. In addition, if you refer to the talk page for the Theories:Events page, it is mentioned why the dozen theories were removed. Simply adding "it is unknown at this time the extent" isn't evidence, it's stating the exact same thing as leaving the notes portion blank. --Bob 21:52, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
Theories, part 2
- Ice Vision, despite the quality edits you've made to other articles, and they are appreciated, many of the edits you are making to the Theories pages are disruptive. Please refrain from adding further implausible theories. Thank you. (Admin 22:04, 10 April 2007 (EDT))
- For adding unfounded theories, include canonical references in citations. If there are none, put "None." Otherwise, following the form of citing the specific reference in an episode/GN, followed by (Genesis) or whatever. It makes the theories page clean, something that took me about 3hrs to clean up for all theories pages. Again, refer to Help:Theories if you need anything further.--Bob 00:27, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- I removed the spoilers (refer to Help:Spoilers). To get a simple explanation from sysops, read User talk:Heroe#Spoilers.--Bob 21:36, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
BTD
I'm not quite sure what a fan-created MySpace page about the Burnt Toast Diner has to do with the Heroes 360 site primatechpaper.org, but if you could tell me, I'd be really interested. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Moving an article
Hi. I think you should have discussed us wiht us before you decided to move an article. Heroe!(talk) 20:11, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
Image:Heart.JPG
Hey, Ice Vision. When you get a minute, could you please note the source for Image:Heart.JPG? Then you could also remove the Uncredited Images category. Thanks! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Quotes
Hey, Ice Vision. Quick tip -- when adding Memorable Quotes, check out the transcript site. They have a transcript for every episode (they seem to take about a week or less to get each one), and, in my opinion, are very accurate. Hope that helps! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Pics of dead guys
Ice Vision, I realize that both men have their brains removed and are wearing beards, but that does not mean they are the same person. There is simply no evidence of that, other than your opinion that they look similar. Further, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that they are different people: Bennet shows Eden the picture on October 11th, and Isaac isn't killed until November. Plus, the picture was taken sometime before October 11th. Not only that, Isaac is sitting in the next room at Primatech. Besides the fact that the Trivia section is in the wrong area, those changes really need to be reverted. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:57, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
- I never said that they were the same person. They are clearly different people. But the same dummies were used for two different bodies. The writers do it often, they use something twice instead of doing two different things. I think I might have needed to clarify what I have said.
- Well, that makes a lot more sense, you can see why I was so confused by the note you added. However, even though they are most likely the same prop dummy, are we really sure they are the same? Perhaps they used the same mold for two different dummies, or they ordered another model from the dummy-making company. Or maybe they just look the same but aren't really the exact same dummies. I mean, in the end, we just don't know one way or the other, do we? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:21, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry about the confusion. I guess we don't know for sure. But because they are very similar, I'm pretty sure they're the same. When I put yourself in the writers' shoes, I wouldn't get another dummy, I would just use the same one, but make a few changes (clothing, surroundings, lighting, etc.). Also, since the photo was only shown for a few seconds, they probably thought nobody would notice. It was something minor and not that big of a deal. But since there is no confirmation, I'm going to reword the trivia.
- Well, that makes a lot more sense, you can see why I was so confused by the note you added. However, even though they are most likely the same prop dummy, are we really sure they are the same? Perhaps they used the same mold for two different dummies, or they ordered another model from the dummy-making company. Or maybe they just look the same but aren't really the exact same dummies. I mean, in the end, we just don't know one way or the other, do we? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:21, 23 April 2007 (EDT)