This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Theory talk:Jackie Wilcox

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why? I think the theory regarding her bitchiness isn't even funny, much less appropriate. --Bob (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

  • Agreed!--SacValleyDweller (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
    • Wow...um....not cool. ¬_¬ --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 16:15, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
      • Goodbye forever so sayeth the spider. --DocM 16:16, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
        • Humour is subjective. :) --User: Cairoi 17:01, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
          • That's very true, and this may be appropriate on a forum, but not here. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 17:29, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
          • I was hesitant to just delete it immediately because of some other theories we have, but at least they pertain to something said on the show. No one says Jackie isn't a bitch, so I don't see how "Jackie is a bitch" is a theory. That's like me making the theory "Peter is nice". It's not a theory, it's an opinion, and a pretty well accepted opinion. --Bob (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
            • I hate to say it, but Noah Bennet calls Jackie a bitch in Six Months Ago. --DocM 19:31, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
              • Which is why I said this is not a theory. If someone said "Jackie's not a bitch", then the theory would try to prove that she IS a bitch. It's the basic definition of a theory: to prove something contrary to popular belief (which is generally unknown).--Bob (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
                • Oh, sorry. I misread your post. Apologies. I read it as "No one says Jackie is a bitch", which is why I said that. Again, apologies. --DocM 20:57, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

AFD

I don't mind the theory about the Shanti virus (though it's, uh, very implausible), but the theory about her dainty hands is irrelevant, unnecessary, and is just not funny. Plus, it really is proven, so no need for it. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:52, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

  • It seems like the person who made the theory was doing it as a joke, but it's just not funny (though humor is subjective, I think I have a pretty open sense of humor, and it's just not funny to me). Aside from that, I don't see the need to make theories about someone who's dead and who isn't an EH (regarding the virus). So I'm for axing it.--Bob (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
    • While I probably get outcast for saying it, I find this article's original content about as relevant and humorous as Theory:Mr._Muggles and Theory:Waffles. With articles like those, who's judge for what does and doesn't get to be community wikiplaygrounds? Sure, it had some foul language, but that actually came from the source. -- Lulu (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
However, I still advocate this page's deletion. -- Lulu (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
      • In cases like this it's purely based on community consensus of whether it should remain based on the content alone rather than whether it meets some kind of policy. For instance there's no explicit reason for us to have the Theory articles about waffles and Mr. Muggles except that there's general consensus that they're entertaining and worth having around. (Admin 09:22, 31 March 2008 (EDT))
        • Right. Since humor is subjective, it's subjective to the community at large. I don't have much use for the theory pages, so my opinion probably shouldn't be weighted as heavily as others'. But for what it's worth, I'm fine with the virus theory--it stretches the bounds of reality and plausibility, but I suppose it's still possible, and therefore acceptable. But the dainty hands "theory" stretches the bounds of my patience and tolerance--it is not really a theory and seems like a poor excuse for somebody to have their voice heard; if it were up to me, it would go. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
  • The only part of this that I found funny was the "corpsy and shit" part, but that's gone, so now the dainty hands theory is pretty useless. Delete. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 13:00, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
    • I don't mind the virus theory. But as for the "dainty hands" theory--if Tim Kring said it, it's already a fact, not a theory, and should be removed.--MiamiVolts (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
  • Since all the questionable theories have been removed, I'm removing the afd tag.--Bob (talk) 12:14, 18 April 2008 (EDT)