User talk:NatG83: Difference between revisions
imported>NatG83 No edit summary |
imported>NatG83 No edit summary |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Hello, |
===Hello, Nat!=== |
||
{{helpbox}} |
{{helpbox}} |
||
'''Welcome to Heroes Wiki!''' |
'''Welcome to Heroes Wiki!''' |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Once again, welcome to Heroes Wiki! |
Once again, welcome to Heroes Wiki! |
||
---- |
|||
== How Can Sylar Be Killed? == |
|||
== Theories == |
|||
Sylar acquired Clair Bennet's [[Rapid Cell Regeneration]] in [[The Second Coming]]. Since that time, Sylar has been able to regenerate from almost all attacks. According to clair and Sylar, the only way they were able to die is if the "spot" in the back of their heads was impaled. Sylar acquired [[shape shifting]] from [[James Martin]]. With Shape shifting, Sylar was able to move the spot. We must guess, however, that the spot still exists. |
|||
My discussion topic is what power exists that can potentially kill Sylar if/when his consciousness reacquires his body? [[Stephen Canfield]]'s ability would have been able to send Sylar through a vortex, eliminating him from the world. Howerver, Stephen Canfield is presumed dead. |
|||
The pluses and minuses used in theory arguments are to be used in relation to the main theory, not to the argument they credit or discretit. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 17:03, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
In Angela's one vision, Claire died from having her head removed. This might be a possible way to kill Claire or Sylar. |
|||
: I don't think that's accurate. I there is a rules section that states otherwise, please link to it. I was discrediting another user's arguments since they don't state any evidence. |
|||
Hiro/Peter could ultimately teleport and time travel Sylar into the future, then leave him there. If they change this future, Sylar would meet the same fate as [[Caitlin]]. |
|||
:: That user would be me, and I am putting forth evidence, you're just not understanding it. The directions are at the bottom of the page when you're editing a theory page, below the save page button, right column, third topic. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 17:39, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
Finally, could an [[Jeremy Greer]] use his ability to counter Rapid Cell Regeneration to extent that he could kill Sylar? It's a stretch, but could be possible. |
|||
:::You were putting forth speculation, not evidence. I understand what you are saying, but you don't understand what I am saying. Also, we are debating "Healing Touch" in the "Noah Bennet" Theory board. The initial theory just sighting the Linderman example as evidence. |
|||
::::The one thing I'm trying to make clear is that the argument of the possibility of Linderman being able kill is flawed. I'm refuting the Linderman argument by pointing out the likelihood of Linderman and Jeremy not having the same ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 17:50, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
:::::And I am demonstrating that it hasn't been state that Linderman couldn't kill. You're argument is based on speculation, just as mine is. As it stands, they are both listed with the same ability. Logically, this leads us to the conclusion that both individuals are capable of the same thing. Also, the Theory Rules don't confirm your earlier statement about the pluses and minuses. Actually, it's quite the contrary. Reread them, it states not to refer to the "original post" |
|||
::::::Not really, like I pointed out, Jeremy being documented and having his ability classified as healing touch before all of its effects were studied breaks its credibility, the in-universe structure does it. everytime we can't determine beyond reasonable doubt, both with in-universe evidence and our own argumentations that two people have the same ability, we split them, otherwise the waffle lady from the Carnival would be listed as having Luke's ability, for example. They're very similar abilities, but because we can't say for sure they're the same, we don't. The topic says "Use {{plus}}, {{minus}}, and {{note}} in the Notes column to denote evidence for, evidence against, and general information respectively." There' also a link to a help file in the blue template at right of this page. What we need is a third party. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 18:00, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
::::::: COuld you actually site something referring to Jeremy, just like you did for the "Plus/Minus Issue?" I don't believe you can |
|||
::::::::We have [[:Image:Jeremy.jpg|this]], it's a screenshot of his entry in Noah's file. According to it, he was 13 when he was reported, so he was bagged and tagged. As you can see from his entry, nothing suggests his ability had harmful effects, everything they say he did involved healing. They erased his memory and returned him home, without even knowing he had an ability, the Company determined he should rediscover it during the following years. They named his ability, based on what they saw, which clearly isn't everything it does. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 18:42, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
:::::::::Hate to say this to you, but that more likely supports my view point. Clearly, Linderman and Ishi Nakamura don't have similar files to review. But it says the kid's power is Healing touch. Ever hear the saying, "The lord giveth, and he taketh away," or some variation? |
|||
::::::::::And how does them not having files equals them being able to kill with their abilities? The lack of something denying their ability to kill isn't the same as there being something confirming it. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 18:54, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
:::::::::::Because there's a page that states the three of them have the same ability, and nothing that states that they do not. I can't make it any simpler. And for the last time, stop deleting theory responses. |
|||
::::::::::::I'm only restoring an edit from a third party you're deleting now. And the page can be easily changed, on going discussions can lead to the ability being split. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 18:59, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
:::::::::::::You keep deleting my post. Restore the edit with my post, and that'd be cool. On Going discussions might change it, the key word being "might." The fact is, it is a theory with no evidence against it. Linderman and Jeremy's powers are currently listed as the same. |
|||
::::::[[Help:Theories]] does not use the phrase "original post" at all. - [[User:Josh|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh|contribs]]) 18:20, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
:::::::"If you have information that either supports or refutes a '''theory''', add it to the appropriate column in that theory's entry." Supports or refutes the theory, what's in the first column in the theory page, if the argument is discrets a previous argument, and that previous argument is meant to discredit the theory, then the argument helps credit the theory, meaning it's a plus. Also in the page: "The third column provides any additional information, such as canon information which refutes the theory or makes it less likely to be true, but also including non-canon source information which supports or refutes the '''theory'''. This includes any reasoning or conjecture based on canon or non-canon information. Use {{plus}}, {{minus}} and {{note}} for proper notation of relevance to the '''theory'''." Again, in relation to the theory, not the previous argument. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 18:29, 22 October 2009 |
|||
:::::::::You're right about that. My bad. Oh, and stop deleting items from the theory. That is cleaerly stated as being against the WIKI rules. |
|||
::::::::::It says "Do not remove information from the theory articles ''merely because you personally disagree with it or do not believe a theory is plausible''." You also might be thinking of talk pages. - [[User:Josh|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh|contribs]]) 19:01, 22 October 2009 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:47, 24 October 2009
Hello, Nat!
| Help | |
|---|---|
| General Help | |
| Special Topics | |
| For more help...
Contact an administrator Or leave a message | |
Welcome to Heroes Wiki!
Here are a few links to get you started:
- If you are new to Heroes, you might want to start at the New User Portal.
- If you're not too familiar with editing wikis, you might like to start with Help:Editing.
- If you already are familiar with wikiediting, you might want to try Help:Style.
- If you're ready to get started, Template:Todo lists some ways you can help out.
- Of course, if you have your own idea for a new article, that's great, too.
- Recent Changes will let you see others' contributions as they happen.
- To make Recent Changes more useful for all users, remember to provide an edit summary in the Summary field before you save your changes.
- You can set the wiki to prompt you for a summary in your preferences.
- When posting on an article's Talk page you should add --~~~~ or click the signature button.
- This will add a signature and timestamp to the end of your comment so others can easily tell who posted it.
- Any new sections on an article's Talk page should be added to the bottom of the page and not to the top.
- When editing normal article pages, don't sign your contributions.
- If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to leave a message for an administrator.
- You can also customize your user page if you like.
Once again, welcome to Heroes Wiki!
How Can Sylar Be Killed?
Sylar acquired Clair Bennet's Rapid Cell Regeneration in The Second Coming. Since that time, Sylar has been able to regenerate from almost all attacks. According to clair and Sylar, the only way they were able to die is if the "spot" in the back of their heads was impaled. Sylar acquired shape shifting from James Martin. With Shape shifting, Sylar was able to move the spot. We must guess, however, that the spot still exists.
My discussion topic is what power exists that can potentially kill Sylar if/when his consciousness reacquires his body? Stephen Canfield's ability would have been able to send Sylar through a vortex, eliminating him from the world. Howerver, Stephen Canfield is presumed dead.
In Angela's one vision, Claire died from having her head removed. This might be a possible way to kill Claire or Sylar.
Hiro/Peter could ultimately teleport and time travel Sylar into the future, then leave him there. If they change this future, Sylar would meet the same fate as Caitlin.
Finally, could an Jeremy Greer use his ability to counter Rapid Cell Regeneration to extent that he could kill Sylar? It's a stretch, but could be possible.