This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Daniel Linderman: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Baldbobbo
imported>Ryangibsonstewart
Line 17: Line 17:
* Either that, or find a different way to link to archived spoilers. The text is misleading, since it implies following the link will bring up actual spoilers, which it does not. Also, we should probably decide what to do when an article has both archived and pending spoilers.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:54, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
* Either that, or find a different way to link to archived spoilers. The text is misleading, since it implies following the link will bring up actual spoilers, which it does not. Also, we should probably decide what to do when an article has both archived and pending spoilers.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:54, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
** I say if there's a need for an individual spoiler page, to archive aired spoilers to show that it is no longer a current spoiler. If there are current spoilers still for that character, then continue to have it on the active page. Otherwise, just have an archive box similar to the one used for Talk pages for Users.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 16:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
** I say if there's a need for an individual spoiler page, to archive aired spoilers to show that it is no longer a current spoiler. If there are current spoilers still for that character, then continue to have it on the active page. Otherwise, just have an archive box similar to the one used for Talk pages for Users.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 16:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
**I'm ready to delete all the archived spoilers. However, I understand there are people that enjoy reading them. Why don't we make the link say "Archived Spoilers" instead of just "Spoilers"? (I don't think there are any "current" spoilers on those 3 pages.) &mdash; [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 17:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:57, 12 April 2007

Where's Simone?

Isn't Simone somehow affiliated with Linderman? Like he's one of her customers or something? I recall hearing her say that in one of the more recent episodes but can't recall which one or I'd just add it. Maybe I'm not remembering correctly? Seems weird she's not mentioned in this page but we see Nathan and Aron. --ZachsMind 17:59, 7 February 2007 (EST) ...woah. Never mind. Scrolled right past it. It was Nothing To Hide. My bad.. Was that it tho? --ZachsMind 18:01, 7 February 2007 (EST)

  • She also says he's a customer of hers in Godsend when she sends Hiro and Ando off with the dino painting. She says he buys as many of Isaac's paintings as he can get his hands on. It's not really clear whether he buys anything from her apart from Isaac's paintings. But yeah, Nothing to Hide is the earliest.--Hardvice (talk) 18:05, 7 February 2007 (EST)

South park trivia

I think the bit about south park and pot pies is uh, a bit too trivial for even the trivia section.. --Frantik (Talk) 07:49, 6 March 2007 (EST)

Linderman's power

is it too early to add linderman's power??? for those of u that dont know, it in one of the clips that was released today Theturtleguy 14:14, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

  • Still a bit too early. We don't put spoilers on main pages until the episode has aired, or until a graphic novel reveals it. Until then, stick to Spoiler:.07%. :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:21, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Spoilers link

No need to link to old spoilers? Should we take off the link that's on Zach's page? And Candace's? — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

  • Either that, or find a different way to link to archived spoilers. The text is misleading, since it implies following the link will bring up actual spoilers, which it does not. Also, we should probably decide what to do when an article has both archived and pending spoilers.--Hardvice (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
    • I say if there's a need for an individual spoiler page, to archive aired spoilers to show that it is no longer a current spoiler. If there are current spoilers still for that character, then continue to have it on the active page. Otherwise, just have an archive box similar to the one used for Talk pages for Users.--Bob 16:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
    • I'm ready to delete all the archived spoilers. However, I understand there are people that enjoy reading them. Why don't we make the link say "Archived Spoilers" instead of just "Spoilers"? (I don't think there are any "current" spoilers on those 3 pages.) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)