This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Joseph's ability: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>TrueBlueBrooklynite |
imported>Altes No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**Joseph's ability just now, that way if it is mental manipulation we are not wrong, but if it's not, we're still not wrong. --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 14:26, 15 December 2009 (EST) |
**Joseph's ability just now, that way if it is mental manipulation we are not wrong, but if it's not, we're still not wrong. --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 14:26, 15 December 2009 (EST) |
||
*** Personally I think it's something like '''Ability Negation''', which would explain that Samuel could never reach his full potential. |
*** Personally I think it's something like '''Ability Negation''', which would explain that Samuel could never reach his full potential. |
||
**** That was because there were too few evolved humans in the carnival to give Samuel a significant boost. My theory is - it's telepathy. Because in Bloodlines he somehow knows which Eli is the Prime. {{User:Altes/Signature}} |
|||
Revision as of 19:38, 15 December 2009
What is it?
Joseph used his power on Doyle in iStory. It looked a lot like mental manipulation. But he didn't touch Doyle to knock him out. So... Your thoughts? 
AltesUTC CH 14:24, 15 December 2009 (EST)
- I think it is mental manipulation.-- Yoshi | Talk | Contributions 14:25, 15 December 2009 (EST)
- Joseph's ability just now, that way if it is mental manipulation we are not wrong, but if it's not, we're still not wrong. --mc_hammark 14:26, 15 December 2009 (EST)
- Personally I think it's something like Ability Negation, which would explain that Samuel could never reach his full potential.
- Joseph's ability just now, that way if it is mental manipulation we are not wrong, but if it's not, we're still not wrong. --mc_hammark 14:26, 15 December 2009 (EST)