User talk:Leckie: Difference between revisions
imported>D and d 123 →Explanation: new section |
imported>Leckie remember your sig |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Please add. == |
== Please add. == |
||
Hi Leckie, I just made a theories page for my characters on Neighbourhood Life so could you please add a couple of theories. :) [[User:Mr. muggles mike|Mr. muggles mike]] 13:08, 2 May 2010 (EDT) |
Hi Leckie, I just made a theories page for my characters on Neighbourhood Life so could you please add a couple of theories. :) --[[User:Mr. muggles mike|Mr. muggles mike]] 13:08, 2 May 2010 (EDT) |
||
== Explanation == |
== Explanation == |
||
Knox's ability was ''not'' enhanced strength; it differs from enhanced strength in several vital ways. Enhanced strength is a passive ability; Knox's ability was active. Enhanced strength is always available; Knox could not use his ability without a nearby source of fear to utilize. Arguing that Knox possessed the same ability as Niki Sanders and Mohinder Suresh is like claiming that Ted Sprague actually had pyrokinesis just because his power could set objects on fire. Embracing a foolish choice made by the writers just because it was the writers that made it is completely illogical. It limits our ability to theorize, makes the site less intuitive to navigate, and sparks ridiculous arguments. |
Knox's ability was ''not'' enhanced strength; it differs from enhanced strength in several vital ways. Enhanced strength is a passive ability; Knox's ability was active. Enhanced strength is always available; Knox could not use his ability without a nearby source of fear to utilize. Arguing that Knox possessed the same ability as Niki Sanders and Mohinder Suresh is like claiming that Ted Sprague actually had pyrokinesis just because his power could set objects on fire. Embracing a foolish choice made by the writers just because it was the writers that made it is completely illogical. It limits our ability to theorize, makes the site less intuitive to navigate, and sparks ridiculous arguments. --[[User:D and d 123|D and d 123]] 18:01 3 May 2010 |
||
Revision as of 19:10, 3 May 2010
Welcome to my talk page, whether you have a question or you would just like to tell me something, please don't hesitate to post it :)
ARCHIVES
| Archives: Feb - June 2009 • June - Sept 2009 • Oct - Dec 2009 • Dec 2009 • Jan 2010 (Part 1) • Jan 2010 (Part 2) • Feb 2010 • March 2010 • April 2010 • May 2010 • June 2010 |
PLease check
Forum. -- By Danko CH 12:32, 1 May 2010 (EDT)
Please add.
Hi Leckie, I just made a theories page for my characters on Neighbourhood Life so could you please add a couple of theories. :) --Mr. muggles mike 13:08, 2 May 2010 (EDT)
Explanation
Knox's ability was not enhanced strength; it differs from enhanced strength in several vital ways. Enhanced strength is a passive ability; Knox's ability was active. Enhanced strength is always available; Knox could not use his ability without a nearby source of fear to utilize. Arguing that Knox possessed the same ability as Niki Sanders and Mohinder Suresh is like claiming that Ted Sprague actually had pyrokinesis just because his power could set objects on fire. Embracing a foolish choice made by the writers just because it was the writers that made it is completely illogical. It limits our ability to theorize, makes the site less intuitive to navigate, and sparks ridiculous arguments. --D and d 123 18:01 3 May 2010