User talk:Ted C

Powers Articles

• The powers articles are great so far! In fact, I'm not sure they really need to be labeled as stubs ... they're about as complete as they can be, given the information we have. I'm going to go ahead and alter the template to link to them now. It'll make red links, but I think you've demonstrated that these deserve to have their own articles.--Hardvice (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2006 (EST)
• I know you're not the only one, but I really appreciate all the work you've been doing on the articles for the individual powers - they look terrific. Thanks! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:44, 8 December 2006 (EST)

Young Evolvies

TedC, I liked your theory about Micah and Claire discovering their powers when they were young. You might want to include a note about Sanjog, too... :) - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2006 (EST)

• Thanks. I made an update in the Theories:Micah section. --Ted C 15:35, 11 December 2006 (EST)

Exploding Man (painting)

Thanks for "fulfilling my wishes" - the page looks great! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:08, 29 December 2006 (EST)

Paradox

Thanks for putting Paradox on a diet - it looks so much better! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2007 (EST)

• No problem. --Ted C 15:25, 8 January 2007 (EST)

Isaac's power

• According to your userpage, you have "a special interest in clearly defining how the powers of the various characters work." Well then you should check out MY userpage. I have a great theory written. I'm sure you'll find it interesting. -- Crevaner 15:47, 25 January 2007 (EST)
  • There isn't any evidence for my theory. It's just for fun. It will just be for my userpage. -- Crevaner 16:13, 25 January 2007 (EST)

Wordsmith

You have such a consistent and clear way of wording those powers... Thanks! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2007 (EST)

• I'd better. I'm a technical writer by profession. --Ted C 10:12, 13 February 2007 (EST)
  • I know I've said it before, but you really rock at how clear you are when you word info about the powers. Great job, Ted. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:58, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
    • Thanks! --Ted C 16:42, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Chronology

I know it seems really counterintuitive, but the way we have all the histories so far are in order of release date or airing. For instance, Six Months Ago comes after Homecoming even though it takes place, well, six months prior. In the notes and galleries, it tends to be a bit more fuzzy, but in the history all the other pages go by release/airing. Thanks! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2007 (EST)

• Were not the GN and the episode released effectively at the same time? I don't know exactly when the GN went "live", so I couldn't say. Certainly they're on the same day, at least. --Ted C 17:13, 13 February 2007 (EST)
  • Right. The GN goes live somewhere around 3 or 4 am, sometimes as late as 5. It's seems arbitrary, but all the other character histories have the GN listed after the accompanying episode (see Jessica: Better Halves and Stolen Time time were released on the same night, but the GN is listed second, despite it taking place six months prior to the episode. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Five Years Gone

I understand the logic, but the section is called "Character History" and is for events that happen to that character. The link to the possible future versions of the characters just doesn't belong in such a section. It should be in Notes or See Also; otherwise, we're implying that Future Character X's events either have happened or will happen to present-day Character X.--Hardvice (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

Admin

• Hi, Ted. Are you interested in being an administrator here? (Admin 14:11, 3 May 2007 (EDT))
  • Sure. What would the job entail? --Ted C 15:01, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
    • Here's the job description. And welcome aboard! (I am now four for four on admin nominations; go me!)--Hardvice (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
      • Welcome aboard, Ted. Let us know if you have any questions, of course. :) Ryan"3-for-3"Stewart (talk) 15:15, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
        • Gratz mate :) Hope you do not plan to takeover the world now you have THE POWER! :) -- FrenchFlo (talk)        15:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
          • Everything is proceeding according to my design.</Sith> --Ted C 16:14, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
            • Aww man, I wanted to be an admin! :( <hint,hint> Heroe!(talk) (contribs) ^{Random Page!} 16:27, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
              • It might be worth noting that I never actually asked for the job. --Ted C 12:49, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
    • Ok, I've given you administrator privileges now. Two new administrators in one day... woo! (Admin 19:42, 3 May 2007 (EDT))
      • Congrats Ted on being new admin! Jason Garrick 21:42, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
        • So, when do more admins get picked? (ahem...) Heroe!(talk) (contribs) ^{Random Page!} 21:44, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
          • AHEM Heroe!(talk) (contribs) ^{Random Page!} 21:38, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
            • It's rare for us to add additional admins. There is no schedule, it's based on when we feel we need some additional help with administrative duties. There's not a big difference between being an admin and not being one. The wiki empowers all users to handle most management functions. (Admin 21:44, 10 May 2007 (EDT))

Mr. Petrelli

• I don't think they've revealed Mr. Petrelli's first name. I suspect "James" might just be a rumor or misinformation. I changed the article back to "unnamed father". If you see any other references I recommend changing them back to "unnamed father" as well until there's credible proof. (Admin 17:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
  • No problem. --Ted C 17:34, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

Ando's Death.

It was in a drawing :P--Riddler 22:54, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

Name Voting

You might want to add a line on your intro to the name voting for bliss and horror that voting doesn't necessarily mean that name will be chosen. For instance, if a bunch of people vote for a name that's very speculative in nature, or is just really too far out there, we certainly shouldn't use it. I just don't want to give the impression on any kind of voting that majority votes will automatically yield a name change. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 11:24, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Update your vote

Talking of the new name consistency for Guillame, you said, "I'm good with it" referring to my suggesting of making it be consistent, and be 'Emotion(al) Manipulation'. But you didn't change your vote....mind moving it? Maybe we can get this finalized today. --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 06/19/2007 14:23 (EST)