User talk:Ryangibsonstewart

Archives	Archived Topics
Nov - Dec 2006	Piping links to redirects • Adding a Talk Link to your Signature • Prophecy Caps • Note re: Replaced Images • Are we in England? • image citations • TOC • Ohmyn0 iiiiss a power. • Admin • Sports Book • Can I borrow your brain? • Whew! • Images • Happy Holidays ... what'd I miss? • Jessica's gun • Graphic Novel Characters Portal • Pages You'd Like to See • Artwork Redirects • Prophecy Article • Prophecy links to paintings
Jan 2007	Integrating Story Arcs • References Split • Admin portal • Merging articles • Comic Book Guru Needed! • Heh • Genesis • Argh! • Sins against all that is good and holy, pt. 2 • Family Trees • Utah, Lovely Utah • Spam Alert • The Joys and Perils of Airline Travel • Portal:Items • Email address • RE:Yatta's • Thank You • Portal Formatting • Woah • Re: Reuploading Images • 9 • Re:Future episode information • Pass the baton • Abandoned Refinery
Feb 2007	James Walker and Freeze • Windchimes • Heroes/Herpes • Theories Subpages • Vanity List • Advice Plz • Returning the thanks • For shame! • Caps • Micah's school and Bully • Template: News • Supporting Characters • The List seen in Run! • Proactive Picture Gathering • Can you... • Just a heads up. • Thanks for the cleanups for Unexpected • Couple Questions • Deletion policy • Backlinks on statistics

Heroes Wiki character list

:P

What do you think of a Heroeswiki-wide character list?

Keep it a fan creations thing, let everyone add their own character and description, and maybe even write our own stories around it?

I'll start it, I'll note to limit the amount of characters one makes to keep it shorter.

Maybe one or two per heroeswiki contributor.

It could be fun :)

Maybe call it, The Heroes Wiki Heroes? :P --Riddler 22:22, 1 March 2007 (EST)

• I'm assuming you're referring to the character list you have on your user page, or the one created by ZachsMind? Those are great -- very entertaining! I think they're better off on user pages, since they're just fun and not based on anything real, but that's just my opinion. :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2007 (EST)
  • --Well it WAS based on that... but this one was more of a group thing, everyone contributes something, it'd be a fan creation like Incidental Heroes... even if it's not a series of videos.

    Unless you specifically say no, do you mind if I make it? Anyone can add their own bits and peices at will. --Riddler 23:13, 1 March 2007 (EST)

    • Well, I'm not exactly for it as its own page. Incidental Heroes is a factual article reporting on a series of web videos. Since this would be your own creation, it's not really factual. Now, I might be a sysop here, but I'm not the only one, and I'm not the only person in the community. If you make the page, I won't delete it, but that doesn't mean I endorse it. It's a very fun idea, but I just think it's better off on user pages. But if there's a strong mandate for it from the community, I won't stand in anyone's way. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2007 (EST)
    • I'm not sure Heroes Wiki would be the best place for stories on these characters. I think it would be more appropriate if the stories were elsewhere and the info here would just be a reference article about this particular collection of fan fiction. I think this is similar to what Ryan was saying. (Admin 00:52, 2 March 2007 (EST))
      • You took the words right out of my mouth fingertips. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2007 (EST)
• Not to sound like an overly sensitive 'mo, but can we change this section title? It bugs me looking at it on RC, and if it makes me uncomfortable, I'll guarantee others will take much more offense at it.--Hardvice (talk) 01:06, 2 March 2007 (EST)
  • I hadn't even noticed it, to be perfectly honest. Thanks for changing it. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:33, 2 March 2007 (EST)

Not Sure about this...

Heroes 360 revealed this: List of powers. It is suppoused to be by mohinder... so we might wanna update ours against his. Also, my girl thinks I am obsessed with the show, so the few edits I did tonight are my final ones. Thanks for keeping an awesome wiki going! Anomy 00:02, 7 March 2007 (EST)

• My wife thinks I'm obsessed too ... and she's right.

  Thanks for the list -- it looks good. It seems like most of the powers are the same or similar to ours. A few standouts: technokinesis, healing and spontaneous regeneration (which should probably be a redirect but not a name change, since the name came from the Genesis files), super strength, mechanical intuition (which we considered, in some form or another, at one time, but decided to the power was more than just "mechanical" -- I like our name better, and I've noticed a lot of other sites using it, too), empathy (which redirects, and there was a huge discussion about that after The Fix, and I like the "mimicry" part of our title). — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:14, 7 March 2007 (EST)

  • I noticed intuitive aptitude at the bottom. Go us. I also noticed some missing powers (persuasion, eidetic memory, for instance) and a few spelling mistakes (it's->its). I wonder how much this list (though a good read) can be trusted. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:16, 7 March 2007 (EST)
    • I really wish their site wasn't a wiki. It seems odd to be saying so on a Wiki, but it makes all of the info suspect as far as we're concerned.--Hardvice (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)
      • Yeah, wikis are all a bunch of bunk, full of false information. oh wait... — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:27, 7 March 2007 (EST)
      • I agree, Hardvice. I would have been more excited had it not been a wiki since it would have felt a little more trustworthy. (Admin 00:45, 7 March 2007 (EST))
        • Incidentally it's hosted on the same server as nbc.com. (Admin 00:48, 7 March 2007 (EST))
          • ...which actually makes me trust the fans more than NBC! :) ... The fact that they list intuitive aptitude kinda cracks me up, considering our community totally made up that name (see here). It's quite flattering, but shouldn't be confused with canon. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2007 (EST)
            • If you check out the edits on the wiki a lof of them really are poor quality. I definitely wouldn't trust the info there. (Admin 00:56, 7 March 2007 (EST))
              • As far as I can tell it is all made by fans (just go through the edits), so it is not canon. -Lөvөl 16:45, 7 March 2007 (EST)