iStory:The Private/chapter 302 alternatives: Difference between revisions
imported>MiamiVolts |
imported>MiamiVolts |
||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
* Using Options 2 and 6C is the optimal case. By staying silent and allowing [[Harry]] to talk (Option 2), Rachel learns that she has been under surveillance for sometime by a party unrelated to her captors, and that the party doesn't appear to be the [[CIA]]. By talking to Jim about his appearance and experiences (Option 6C), Rachel gets Jim to open up some about how he got to be in the same pit as her. |
* Using Options 2 and 6C is the optimal case. By staying silent and allowing [[Harry]] to talk (Option 2), Rachel learns that she has been under surveillance for sometime by a party unrelated to her captors, and that the party doesn't appear to be the [[CIA]]. By talking to Jim about his appearance and experiences (Option 6C), Rachel gets Jim to open up some about how he got to be in the same pit as her. |
||
==Trivia== |
==Trivia== |
||
* In this chapter, the [[interviewer]] analyzes Rachel Mills's responses and assigns them to a personality type. Some [[Wikipedia:personality type|personality type]]s have multiple meanings or connotations. Based on the types presented in the different options, the interviewer is likely referring to personality types as classified by the [[Wikipedia:Myers-Briggs Type Indicator|Myers-Briggs Type Indicator]], which classifies |
* In this chapter, the [[interviewer]] analyzes Rachel Mills's responses and assigns them to a personality type. Some [[Wikipedia:personality type|personality type]]s have multiple meanings or connotations. Based on the types presented in the different options and the interviewer saying he evaluated Rachel's personality type based on her responses, the interviewer is likely referring to personality types as classified by the [[Wikipedia:Myers-Briggs Type Indicator|Myers-Briggs Type Indicator]] (MBTI), which classifies personalities based on preferences (not ability). The types presented are classified as follows using MBTI. |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
!Type |
!Type |
||
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
|J |
|J |
||
|Judging |
|Judging |
||
|This personality describes people who have a preference for using the judging function (thinking or feeling) when relating to the outside world. |
|This personality describes people who have a preference for using the judging function (thinking or feeling) when relating to the outside world. Those who prefer ''thinking'' tend to decide things from a more detached standpoint, measuring the decision by what seems reasonable, logical, causal, consistent and matching a given set of rules. Those who prefer ''feeling'' tend to come to decisions by associating or empathizing with the situation, looking at it 'from the inside' and weighing the situation to achieve, on balance, the greatest harmony, consensus and fit, considering the needs of the people involved. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|P |
|P |
||
|Perceiving |
|Perceiving |
||
|This personality describes people who have a preference for using the perceiving function (sensing or intuition) when relating to the outside world. Individuals who prefer ''sensing'' are more likely to trust information that is in the present, tangible and concrete: that is, information that can be understood by the five senses. They tend to distrust hunches that seem to come out of nowhere. They prefer to look for details and facts. For them, the meaning is in the data. On the other hand, those who prefer ''intuition'' tend to trust information that is more abstract or theoretical, that can be associated with other information (either remembered or discovered by seeking a wider context or pattern). They may be more interested in future possibilities. They tend to trust those flashes of insight that seem to bubble up from the unconscious mind. The meaning is in how the data relates to the pattern or theory. |
|||
|This personality describes people who have a preference for using the perceiving function (sensing or intuition) when relating to the outside world. |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
Revision as of 20:54, 26 January 2009
This page notes the different possible versions of chapter 2 of The Private.
All cases (I)
Rachel takes a break from her story when the interviewer leaves temporarily to fetch some coffee. When he returns with his cup and asks Rachel if she wants some, she declines and continues her story when prompted to. Rachel notes that next, her captors dump her in a deep and narrow muddy pit that she cannot climb out. She also realizes her captors had taken some of her blood some time before then, and she waits by herself there for about 12 hours until a rope ladder is lowered to her sometime around sunset and someone says something in Farse. Rachel climbs up the ladder, and upon reaching the surface, observes her surroundings. Rachel sees just a couple of guys and a woman, tribespeople. Behind the three people in front of her is the small village she has been hearing. The village has many low buildings and lots of civilians in jeans and robes walking its dirt streets. Above the roofline, Rachel spots a bunch of boxy, metal buildings outside town.
Rachel is lead to a mess hall where she is interrogated by an Arabic man who introduces himself as Harry. She tells Harry that her people will come for her, and learns from him that she is in Iran and that there is an Iranian army medical facility in the nearby village. When Harry then asks her about her mother, Rachel must decide how to react.
Options (I)
| Option | Summary | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option 1 (return case): ask to be returned to the pit Option 2 (silent case): Option 3 (bargain case): |
|
All cases (II)
Rachel finds she has company in her pit--a man who allows her to sit next to him and then introduces himself as Jim. Rachel notes to herself that a bloody bandage covers Jim's bare chest, and that Jim looked American, but not military due to his hair being too long. However, his being heavy built and having a bullet scar on his other shoulder, Rachel considers Jim being Special Forces. A second later, Jim asks Rachel if they said anything about why they brought her there and Rachel must choose how to respond.
Options (II)
| Option | Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option 4 (warn case): warn Jim that others might be listening Option 5 (silent case): Option 6 (chat case): |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All cases (III)
Ammar proposes for him to return after it is dark and for Rachel and himself to use his motorcycle to make a one to two days drive on a road that the U.S. military is watching to the Iraqi border. Rachel replies that it sounds like his plan is to get them blown up by a Predator drone, but Ammar says that she will signal to her people that they are escaped prisoners when they get close. He adds that part of the deal is that Rachel will tell her people that he's a "good guy". Rachel then asks Ammar about bringing Jim, but Ammar says that there is no room and he can't be trusted. Jim whispers to Rachel that they will jump him and take his bike.
The player is then given the following choice to vote to affect what happens in the next chapter:
Vote for the plan you want to follow...
Vote carefully: your choice affects what happens in the next chapter. Discuss your choice at the 9th Wonders "Friend or Foe" forum. Poll ends and story continues on Monday, 1/26/09. |
Notes
- Using Options 2 and 6C is the optimal case. By staying silent and allowing Harry to talk (Option 2), Rachel learns that she has been under surveillance for sometime by a party unrelated to her captors, and that the party doesn't appear to be the CIA. By talking to Jim about his appearance and experiences (Option 6C), Rachel gets Jim to open up some about how he got to be in the same pit as her.
Trivia
- In this chapter, the interviewer analyzes Rachel Mills's responses and assigns them to a personality type. Some personality types have multiple meanings or connotations. Based on the types presented in the different options and the interviewer saying he evaluated Rachel's personality type based on her responses, the interviewer is likely referring to personality types as classified by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which classifies personalities based on preferences (not ability). The types presented are classified as follows using MBTI.
| Type | Name | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| E | Extroversion | This personality describes people who prefer extraversion draw energy from action: they tend to act, then reflect, then act further. If they are inactive, their level of energy and motivation tends to decline. |
| J | Judging | This personality describes people who have a preference for using the judging function (thinking or feeling) when relating to the outside world. Those who prefer thinking tend to decide things from a more detached standpoint, measuring the decision by what seems reasonable, logical, causal, consistent and matching a given set of rules. Those who prefer feeling tend to come to decisions by associating or empathizing with the situation, looking at it 'from the inside' and weighing the situation to achieve, on balance, the greatest harmony, consensus and fit, considering the needs of the people involved. |
| P | Perceiving | This personality describes people who have a preference for using the perceiving function (sensing or intuition) when relating to the outside world. Individuals who prefer sensing are more likely to trust information that is in the present, tangible and concrete: that is, information that can be understood by the five senses. They tend to distrust hunches that seem to come out of nowhere. They prefer to look for details and facts. For them, the meaning is in the data. On the other hand, those who prefer intuition tend to trust information that is more abstract or theoretical, that can be associated with other information (either remembered or discovered by seeking a wider context or pattern). They may be more interested in future possibilities. They tend to trust those flashes of insight that seem to bubble up from the unconscious mind. The meaning is in how the data relates to the pattern or theory. |
- The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator allows for people to be classified in more than one personality type. For instance, a person can be both type E and J, or both type E and P. The 16 main classifications specified by MBTI are listed at the Myers and Briggs Foundation website.
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Friend or Foe (Operation Bad Blood, Operation Splinter) • The Private (summaries) • The Agent (summaries) • The Civilian (summaries) • Faction Zero (summaries) • Slow Burn (summaries) • The Puppet Master (summaries) • Purpose (summaries) | |||||
| Related iStory Portals: Characters • Locations • Places | |||||