This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

User talk:Hardvice

From Heroes Wiki
Revision as of 01:55, 10 February 2007 by imported>Hardvice
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Help
General Help
Special Topics
For more help...

Contact an administrator

Or leave a message

Archived talk:

Instructions

When posting here, please use the following example syntax: 

==Title of your message==
*This is your message to me. (~~~~)
**This will be my reply. (~~~~)

this will make it easier for me to keep track of conversations.

Are there episode commentaries?

  • I noticed you made a reference to that in the article Wind chime. -- Cuardin 01:49, 2 February 2007 (EST)
    • Yeah. On the NBC site, you can watch the last two episodes with side-by-side video commentary (though I'm guessing it's U.S.-only). It's been pretty insightful so far.--Hardvice (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2007 (EST)
      • I suppose no one is recording the commentaries for future reference? -- Cuardin 03:57, 2 February 2007 (EST)
        • I haven't had any luck stream-recording video from NBC yet, but I guess I could try recording just the audio or transcribing it by hand if I get the time. AFAIK, "Godsend" was the first episode with commentary (from Sendhil Ramamurthy, Jack Coleman, and Leonard Roberts). "The Fix" has commentary from Greg Grunberg and Hayden Panetierre, and then Greg and Natalie Chaidez.--Hardvice (talk) 04:19, 2 February 2007 (EST)
        • Of course, if they're going to all the trouble of recording them, they'll probably be on the DVDs.--Hardvice (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2007 (EST)


Links/Test

The link you sent me didn't work. --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 20:37, 02 February 2007 (EST)

Interviews

Okay, I might be hebetudinous (just learned that word - it's a doozy, eh?), but could you just give me the breakdown on the interviews: where to add them, when to purge them, etc. Thanks! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2007 (EST)

  • Interviews and Template:Interviews is all there is. Right now, I'm keeping the last 10 misc. interviews on the template, just to keep it from getting too huge. There shouldn't be any more 9thWonders interviews, since they were promotional and before the show aired. There's only one CBR interview per episode, so we should be able to fit the whole season before we archive it. And who knows how many Wizard interviews there'll be ... we can burn that bridge and kill the engineer when we get to it. Hope that propels you from hebetudinousness to near-hebephrenia!--Hardvice (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2007 (EST)
  • More to the point: I added everything to interviews 1) to make the page more useful, 2) so I could list dates, and 3) so I could say a little bit about the interview series. I made the "arcvhive" button on the template jump to the proper section, and if and wehn we archive any of the others, we can do the same.--Hardvice (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2007 (EST)
  • The normal process, then, would be like this:
    1. Add interview to subject's page
    2. Add interview to Template:Interviews. Remove one if misc.
    3. Add interview to Interviews--Hardvice (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2007 (EST)
    • Thank you, that's exactly what I was looking for. Hebetude eradicated! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Impressive

  • If you keep going with all these contributions through the night I'm going to have to start assuming you're just some very sophisticated bot. :) (Admin 05:27, 6 February 2007 (EST))
    • Just waiting for the GN. Still no sign.  :( --Hardvice (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2007 (EST)

Meredith's travels

  • The info about Meredith's travels is good, but it belongs on Meredith Gordon, not her home.--Hardvice (talk) 13:32, 6 February 2007 (EST)
    • No problem. I thought about it's placement in both places, and picked 'here home' because of those being 'prior homes', but I can see your point in keeping that page dedicated solely to her current home in Kermit. --(HiroDynoSlayer-talk 14:16, 06 February 2007 (EST))

Nice Work

Nice work on the Petrelli family tree. How do you stop an expoding Nathan? --AverageMan 15:25, 6 February 2007 (EST)


Hey

Not sure why you had to remove that twice. As you can see I'didn't re submit it.--ASEO 16:36, 6 February 2007 (EST)

  • There was an intervening edit. Sometimes that screws things up.--Hardvice (talk) 16:39, 6 February 2007 (EST)

March 5th

   *  02/07 - Question: So, Nathan is Claire's father. That explains why Peter and Claire will never get together. Any new scoop on Heroes?— Kelly

Ausiello: Block off the evening of March 5 in your Outlook calendar: That's when the series regular gets grim-reapered.

March fifth would be episode 18.

What can I do with this? http://www.tvguide.com/News-Views/Columnists/Ask-Ausiello/default.aspx?columndate=07-Feb-2007

  • Do we not have a spoiler article for 18 yet? I can't count that high without taking my shoes off (let's not talk about what happens when we get to 21).--Hardvice (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2007 (EST)
    • Wow you responded quick. I only see spoiler lists up to episode 17 :P --Riddler 01:12, 7 February 2007 (EST)
      • I don't think we have a title for episode 18 yet. You could add Spoiler:Episode 118 and we can move it to the correct title when it's released, or you could just add it to Spoilers for now and wait until the article gets added. IMHO, either is fine, but we're going to have to add an article for 118 eventually anyway...--Hardvice (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2007 (EST)
        • Now before I do this, one more point should be brought up. Someone said that 117 might be the episode on March 5th, and that 118 will be way out in April. Think that's gonna happen? If so, then Spoiler:Episode 118 is useless right now :P--Riddler 01:17, 7 February 2007 (EST)
          • I'm just going to remove the refs above and add the link to the Spoilers page in the general area. That episode is just too far in the future right now; without a title, or blurbs, or airdates, I feel too much could change for us to make an article at this time. --Orne 19:29, 7 February 2007 (EST)


Doop

Did you get my Clach discussion recommendation? --Gargyloveswolfy 19:24, 7 February 2007 (EST) They are at it again, read their comments in the discussion page of Clach, please do something about it PLEASE. --Gargyloveswolfy 20:37, 9 February 2007 (EST)

  • I don't see how any of Doop's edits qualify as vandalism. Most of the points he/she makes on the talk page seem pretty valid. Now that the link is labeled as containing spoilers, it does seem on-point. Claire punching Jackie does seem like it doesn't really belong in that paragraph. The only possible objection is the part about whether Claire would have known if Zach were gay, and that's really pure speculation. It definitely belongs in the article (the fact that it's speculation doesn't make it "redundant"), but it could be made clearer that it's speculation. I'm just not sure what you want me to do, or why. I'm not going to ban somebody for making edits they feel are justified, when they are providing a reason for doing so, just to please somebody else with a contrary opinion. I suggest you two sort it out yourselves.--Hardvice (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2007 (EST)
  • My personal recommendation would be to leave the first paragraph and delete the rest. Everything that needs to be said about the controversy itself is said in the first paragraph. The conversy is that, according to the writers, they intended for the character to be gay and subsequently changed the character (reportedly at the request of Mr. Dekker's management). The rest seems to be opinions on whether he was originally meant to be gay or not, but this is already explained by the first paragraph. The opinions are causing contention akin to whether a particular Theory is valid or not so in the interests of remaining objective I'd opt to remove the subsequent paragraphs entirely. (Admin 20:51, 9 February 2007 (EST))
    • That sounds pretty reasonable. I'll change it now.--Hardvice (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2007 (EST)

Supporting Characters

Hi, Hardvice. I had also realized that there would be a consistency issue with other entries right after I had edited the index template. I saw the existing discussion at the supporting characters template portal, so I took some time to chime in there (around the time you and Ryangibson stewart were messaging me). Thanks. --Mercury McKinnon 19:42, 8 February 2007 (EST)

LJ

Thanks to your LJ that I found this site. <3 Tfo 16:56, 9 February 2007 (EST)

  • And yes, I am still wandering around this site. I'm frankly astonished at the vastness of the material. And none of it written by nine-year-olds. Tfo 17:35, 9 February 2007 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://heroeswiki.ddns.net/index.php?title=User_talk:Hardvice&oldid=399974"