Talk:Hiro Nakamura

Archives
Nov 2006 - Sep 2009

Hiro's illness

• There's a really big possibility that Hiro's illness is caused by the catalyst when it was passed onto him, similarly to what happened to his mother. Anybody agree?--NiveKJ13 (talk2me) 13:01, 19 October 2009 (EDT)
  • No, Masi Oka confirmed it's because Hiro took others into frozen time. This overloaded his brain. AltesUTC CH
    • Cool. Well, its just a theory. --NiveKJ13 (talk2me) 15:25, 19 October 2009 (EDT)
      • That doesn't very well explain why he can time travel now though. Gamerelite1 15:05, 23 October 2009 (EDT)

Hiro's list

I think we should create Hiro's list. We already know some of the things he has on the list and I think it deserves a page. --mc_hammark 15:08, 21 October 2009 (EDT)

Questions

How did Hiro resume time when he was frozen? how did Hiro's ability restore? I'm guessing by time. If Hiro dies and is bought back by Claire's blood would the tumour come back? User:50000JH/signature

• You're really not making sense. Please revise your questions. --mc_hammark 16:13, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

Not being rude but. In what way am I'm not making sense? When Hiro Froze time it said that he was frozen and people were not. has does he come unfrozen? When Matt restored Hiro Ability he only had time stop, how did he get teleport and time travel, Noah said a tumour is living flesh and Claire blood will regenerate it, if Hiro dies from the tumour, would the tumour go when he dies and then be bought back to life would the tumour regenerate again. User:50000JH/signature

• • Maybe when Hiro was still frozen, he couldn't control it while frozen, so maybe it "wore off". Matt Jr. probably restored the whole thing, but since he had also took Matt Jr. with him, like he did with Emma and Ando in other occasions (which was confirmed to be the source of his cancer), it disrupted his ability to teleport. If Hiro dies, there's no coming back, if he gets a blood transfusion, even if there is a single cancer cell left, it'll grow. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 16:30, 22 October 2009 (EDT)

What means Peter heals him after he has a blood transfusion? User:50000JH/signature

• • • Again, you're not making much sense. We shouldn't have to have a hard time understanding what you mean. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 19:04, 23 October 2009 (EDT)
    • Now that you make sense: it makes no sense for Peter to give him a blood transfusion, he doesn't have Claire's ability, and as long as Hiro still has a tumor, getting that blood would only make him sicker. Giving him a transfusion after getting rid of the tumor would be pointless, because he would have already been healed by another ability. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 20:23, 24 October 2009 (EDT)

I mean what would happened if Hiro died because he still had the tumour, but Claire use her blood to bring him back to life and then Peter healed Hiro[50000JH 15:25, 17 November 2009 (EST)]

• If would be no use if the tumor was still there. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 16:03, 17 November 2009 (EST)

Matt

Would Matt finally heal Hiro's tumour, as he did when Angelia had her Commer?50000JH 15:29, 17 November 2009 (EST)

• Tumor and telepathy induced coma are vastly different things. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 16:03, 17 November 2009 (EST)

Vote to change wording on hiro's page

Under Once Upon a Time in Texas, we have "Hiro tackles Samuel and manages to teleport them both back to the present carnival." I vote that we change "teleport" to "tackleport" as it fully explains what he did, which is tackle-teleporting.Gamerelite1 19:54, 14 December 2009 (EST)

• "Tackleport" is not a word. On top of that, I'd hardly call what Hiro did to Samuel "tackling". --Ricard Desi (t,c) 20:43, 14 December 2009 (EST)
  • I'd say it was very tackleish.Gamerelite1 19:29, 16 December 2009 (EST)
    • Im sorry but this idea is retarded 'tackleporting' there are so many things wrong with that Melkor111

MQ

"You're not butterfly men, You're an evil butterfly men."

- Hiro (To Samuel)

I really like this one, should we add it?-- Yoshi | Talk | Contributions 09:21, 26 December 2009 (EST)

• If you check this page you could probably add it there, if it isn't there already that is. As it is, I think we have enough for him, on his page, for the time being. -- Leckie -- Talk 09:26, 26 December 2009 (EST)

Mortal Enemy

Is Adam now Hiro's official mortal enemy or is it still Sylar? I am guessing that it's Adam. I know it was Sylar when he killed his beloved Charlie Andrews, but now he didn't. User:Blood69 14:33, 1 February 2010 (AEST)

• Adam is long dead, it's kind of hard to have a mortal enemy who's no longer around. --Ricard Desi (t,c) 17:29, 1 February 2010 (EST)
  • ...or super easy! -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2010 (EST)
    • Adam's not long dead about a year or so. Melkor111

Hiro's Death

Ok, Ando's supercharged Hiro twice now. So the Ando-kills-Hiro future is pretty much gone now right?--Boycool42 18:07, 20 February 2010 (EST)

• Unless there's more to his ability than he has discovered so far. --mc_hammark 18:13, 20 February 2010 (EST)
• Technically, Hiro's only been supercharged once. The first time was being shocked not amplifying his ability. I don't think there's more to Ando's power, we've seen, I guess, all it can do: supercharge others' abilities, shock things -- to bypass electrical gear and as electroshock therapy -- and it being used as concussive blast. The way Ando killed Hiro in a would-be future looks like a combination of the latter two. --Telos 8:54 24 February 2010 (EST)

Superhiro

Hiro has no tumor, has his full powers, and no longer has to worry about Charlie. oh, this is going to be good...--Boycool42 07:47, 25 February 2010 (EST)

• Anyone agree? Am I alone? T.T--Boycool42 16:11, 27 February 2010 (EST)
  • If I'm being honest with you, that was more of a statement than someone looking for agreement. But yes. I can't wait to see what he does as well. --mc_hammark 16:13, 27 February 2010 (EST)
    • Yeah, I wasn't really thinking when I posted that.--Boycool42 17:29, 1 March 2010 (EST)

Age

Is it safe to change his age to 30, since he was 28 in 2007? (He's also a few months older due to time-travel...)--Boycool42 16:04, 16 March 2010 (EDT)

• Anyone there? Hello?--Boycool42 07:15, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
  • I'm not sure... I think it's more likely that he's older, 31, but 30 should be safe, I think.--MiamiVolts (talk) 11:41, 22 March 2010 (EDT)
  • He was born before March 1979. Add 30 years, and we're at March 2009. It's been at least eight months since then in-universe. Plus time-travel aging. I think it should be safe to put his age as 31.--Boycool42 16:22, 22 March 2010 (EDT)

Saved the World

"I saved the world...twice." Hiro repeatedly says this line. What are the two times he saved the world up to Our Father (first occurrence of the line)? --Boycool42 07:35, 24 March 2010 (EDT)

• First time he "killed" Sylar. The second time he (thought) he stopped Adam from releasing the virus (which technically he did; had Adam been in there any longer, he would have released it). --mc_hammark 09:04, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
  • Ah, I forget he stopped Adam. Thanks.--Boycool42 16:22, 25 March 2010 (EDT)
    • Wouldn't it be three times now since he ripped up the formula in Dual? --?--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 21:08, 25 March 2010 (EDT)
      • No matter how many times he saved it, he would have still have saved it at least twice. --mc_hammark 15:13, 26 March 2010 (EDT)
      • When he ripped up the formula in Dual, he didn't save the world. He simply fufilled the end of a predestination paradox. Remember, at the beginning of the season Hiro only had one half of the formula. He was the one who split it in the first place.--PJDEP - Talk - Polls and Opinions 15:24, 26 March 2010 (EDT)
        • And then he ripped it into dozens of pieces after he got back to present-day, stopping the world from splitting in half.--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 21:48, 26 March 2010 (EDT)

Pass/Fail

Why does Hiro feel so guilty about Sylar's murders? They were already committed. Hiro even saved one of them.--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 09:05, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

• He feels guilty because, even though he was able to pull dozens of strings to save Charlie, he would never be able to save Sylar. His becoming a serial killer was, sadly, too important to the timeline. --Ricard Desi 10:53, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
  • Who gives a flying f*** about the timeline? Hiro could have killed Sylar and stopped dozens of murders and prevented all the bad stuff that happened the past 4 seasons.--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 11:56, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
    • All at the expense of the entire space-time continuum asploding. --mc_hammark 12:31, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
      • It hasn't exploded all the other times he screwed up the timeline. He could just go to Hiro (2006) and tell him to kill Sylar (2006). Simple. Logical.--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 16:16, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
        • I didn't say explode, I said asplode; it's much different. And if he did, it would just ruin the show... besides, he already tried that. --mc_hammark 16:20, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
          • Asplode: "Used satirically in a Strong Bad E-mail as an example of poor Japanese to English video game translation." Please clarify.--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 16:46, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
            • The timeline would asplode. --mc_hammark 16:48, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
              • So what's the difference between "explode" and "asplode"?--BOYCOOL -- THE END IS NIGH. 16:57, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
• Without Sylar, Arthur's army and Samuel's carnival would have started a world war, most likely. Think about it. --Ricard Desi 19:01, 31 March 2010 (EDT)
  • Ah, but with that, one could also argue that then jackie would never have been killed, claire wouldn't have met peter then the whole thing collapses. But I suppose it all depends on when Hiro kills Sylar. Let me know when, then I'll see if I can work out what would have happened based on everyone's path before they met someone who and any sort of link to sylar. Which also means that nathan may have never met hiro... god time is confusing... i don't know how hiro does it... --mc_hammark 19:04, 31 March 2010 (EDT)