This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Assignment Tracker 2.0/Mindy Sprague

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

AT Diagram

I don't think her AT Diagram is the same as Elle's.--MiamiVolts (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2010 (EDT)

  • Looking at it right now, and sadly it is :( Man, what a sloppy job they did on both ATs... --Ricard Desi 01:18, 1 April 2010 (EDT)
  • It is the same as Elle's. The image is from file C023. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:57, 1 April 2010 (EDT)
    • Thanks, guys, for checking on that and noting it on the Assignment Tracker 2.0 page. I guess it was a simple oversight, though sometimes I wonder if they leave these things in just to see if we catch them. :)--MiamiVolts (talk) 23:24, 1 April 2010 (EDT)

Changed again

Its been changed again, her ability is now listed as "Energy absorption, transference, and redistribution" as opposed to "Energy absorption, transference, and redirection". Does this mean we have to change the ability name again? --Leckie -- Talk 18:03, 9 April 2010 (EDT)

  • From the Files of Primatech, Part 4 uses "redirection". Do GN's trump AT's? They are both at the same level of canon according to the naming scale.--Ratclaws 19:01, 9 April 2010 (EDT)
    • We're gonna end up calling it that probably. The ability page'll probably start off like this:
    • Energy absorption, transference, and redistribution (also known as energy absorption, transference, and redirection or energy absorption) is the ability to manipulate energy. The user "can aggregate and refocus energy for alternate external release."
      • Personally guys, I think that energy absorption does fine. It was mentioned as that in a GN (of same canon as the AT) and has similar effects as electrical absorption, only replacing electricity with energy. --mc_hammark 19:33, 9 April 2010 (EDT)
        • It should be one of the longer names, since those were explicitly used. We shouldn't look for ways to get around the explicitness of the names given to us in various files. I don't really have an opinion one way or the other on which of the long names to use (though I'm inclined to use the name used in the Primatech files since there have been lots of mistakes in the recent AT profiles). For the time being, I really do think we should wait a few days to make a decision. They seem to be trying to go back and clean up some of the mistakes in the recently released Assignment Trackers--or at least tweaking the information in them. Let's give them a few days before we start making a decision. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:15, 10 April 2010 (EDT)