User talk:Heroe: Difference between revisions
imported>Lander |
imported>Mc hammark →Congratulations: new section |
||
| (173 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*[[User talk:Heroe/archive1|<span style="color:green">Archive 1:</span><span style="color:black">Nov 2006-Mar 2007</span>]] |
|||
{| border="2" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" class="wikitable" |
|||
*[[User talk:Heroe/archive2|<span style="color:blue">Archive 2:</span><span style="color:black">Mar-May 2007</span>]] |
|||
|- |
|||
*[[User talk:Heroe/archive3|<span style="color:indigo">Archive 3:</span><span style="color:black">May-July 2007</span>]] |
|||
! Archives |
|||
*[[User talk:Heroe/archive4|<span style="color:red">Archive 4:</span><span style="color:black">July-December 2007</span>]] |
|||
! Archived Topics |
|||
|- |
|||
| align=center | [[User talk:Heroe/archive1|My Archive]] || <small>Welcome • Ted's marks • Character Histories • Hiro's sword • Last Appearance • Examples on Powers Pages • Signature • Unknown Powers/No Powers • Opposite Powers • Easter Egg • Emmersion/Immersion • Family Tree • Spelling and grammar • Mistakes on the theories pages • GN content • Sylar Healing plus peter's new gigs • Taking over the World • (Redirected from ___) • Cute cheerleader? • screencaps • Image site linking</small> |
|||
|} |
|||
{{tocright}} |
{{tocright}} |
||
== Type of Pyramid == |
|||
I think the type of pyramid (pointed top) is relevant as to whether it is Egyptian or not. Am I missing something?--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 20:00, 18 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
* The theory was that the pyramid was important. The note pointed out that the style of pyramid was Egyptian, which isn't supporting the theory. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 20:10, 18 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
** Ah, ok.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 20:21, 18 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Hey, Thanks for the name suggestion. I wonder why I never came up with that? (*.*)? -- [[User:Helix of Chaos|Helix of Chaos]] ([[User_talk:Helix of Chaos|talk]]) 01:18, 21 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
== |
== Name meaning == |
||
I've been asked this quite a bit, so I have it all rehearsed, lol. It breaks into The-Requiem-Bell-Is-Here. I went through an emo phase that still lingers, so I've kept it on. A requiem is a funereal mass and the church bell is one of the main instruments used. It's also a line from the Haunted Mansion ride at Disney World! (Albeit warped a little). [[User:Therequiembellishere|Therequiembellishere]] 19:29, 29 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
* Go cut youself emo. Haha no. :P --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 20:35, 29 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
If you use the screencap site, click on the picture. A bigger version will pop up, and that's the one that would be best to upload. Also, the one thing I didn't mention earlier is using the screencaps from that site also requires that you remove the website name and watermark from the picture. You can get most by cropping, but after that, ya gotta photoshop, smudge, or somehow finagle the pic. If you can't get it perfectly, that's fine, somebody else will take care of it... But it ''is'' a good idea to get the full-size pic. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 11:04, 9 March 2007 (EST) |
|||
* I'd also add that, if you're using a digital file, either transferred from a DVR or downloaded from a P2P site, I can't endorse a piece of software called [http://www.virtualdub.org/ Virtual Dub] highly enough. It lets you step through the file frame-by-frame, and there are literally dozens of filters available to allow you to do anything from color and gamma correction to resizing and cropping to dewatermarking on the fly. You can even export clips in just about any format, including animated GIFs. It's pretty amazing software, and it's free.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 13:52, 9 March 2007 (EST) |
|||
**Hardvice, you should really get an endorsement package from Virtual Dub. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:33, 9 March 2007 (EST) |
|||
== Location links on place portals == |
|||
Hey, Heroe. Just so you know, all the [[Portal:Places|place portals]] are really cool -- they will link the location if it exists, but will stay black if it doesn't. That way, you can put "Unknown" if you wanted, or a non-linked place (as in the case of [[Auschwitz]], which is in Poland). Adding the links as you did doesn't hurt at all -- I just want to let you know for future reference, so you understand why they're black and not linked. Thanks for all your hard work, as usual! :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:46, 13 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* Yeah, I kinda noticed that half-way through editiing. :p [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:27, 13 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
== Rename template == |
|||
See here [[Template:Rename]] --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 21:06, 14 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
== Little square things == |
|||
What exactly are you looking for? If you want the bullets, you can either cut and paste this: • or edit this message to cut and paste the escape code I used. Is that what you're looking for? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:57, 14 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*Yeah, thanks! [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 22:59, 14 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
==Non-citations on Theory Pages== |
|||
Thanks for cleaning these up, but it's probably a better idea to move the information to the third column rather than just deleting it. That way, you aren't getting rid of somebody's contribution--you're just putting it in the proper place. |
|||
*OK. [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 15:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
== [[User:Heroe/Wiki experiments]] & image stuff == |
|||
== Happy Birthday == |
|||
Okay, check it out now. I'm heading to bed in just a few minutes, so if you need anything, let me know now. Also, a few notes about [[:Image:Stop sign.png]] and [[:Image:Questionmark.gif]] ... don't forget to include the source where you got them. Also, it'd be nice if they were the same size, so they don't look all wibbly wobbly on the template. But actually, all the other message templates have two of the same icon. I guess you could do whatever you want, but if you choose to go with just one icon, I suggest the question mark. Finally, the image causes a bunch of whitespace around the question mark in the template--you can avoid this by filling it in with the exact <font color=#8B0000>color of the template flag</font> and then reuploading. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 00:08, 27 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Happy birthday, Heroe! =) --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}} 13:40, 30 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
* I need help again :\ I was trying to make separate crewnav bars but they got messed up :/ [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 20:28, 19 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* Happy birthday!--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 14:12, 30 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
** Do you mean separate bars for directors, writers, producers? If so ... ugh. That means some people are going to have four or five navbars. Ick.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 21:02, 19 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** Thanks guys. :) --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 14:25, 30 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
*** Yes. |
|||
==fanfiction== |
|||
**** Well, ok. Most of the writers are also producers, so they'll have at least 2 navbars. Some of them are also GN writers, so that's three for them. Beeman's a director and a producer ... he gets two navbars. Tim Kring is in three groups -- three bars for him. The only people who really benefit from this are most of the directors and some of the miscellaneous people. I just am not seeing why this is a good idea.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 21:02, 19 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*Hey Heroe, have you ever thought about writing fanfiction? Cause you've put several characters on the chart and I think you could make a really good story! They sound very cool. If you ever want to make one, I could help you out. :) [[User:Jason Garrick|Jason Garrick]] 22:43, 7 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
***** Well, it looked pretty crowded to me, so I wanted to split it up. But now I'm just thinking ''oh, screw it!'' [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 21:14, 19 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** Thank you. I wrote a few chapters of a super powers novel. You can read the [http://www.heroestheseries.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4047 here], if you can stand going through all the pages. I'm also a member of a Heroes RPG on the same forum, which I consider somewhat fan fiction. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 23:03, 7 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
****** You're right, it is kind of crowded. But that's not really a fault in our design, it's a product of a crew that wears many hats. If everybody fit into one nice little title ("Hi, I'm a director. Produce? Never. Write? That's for losers! And don't get me started on those comic books!"), it would change things around. But since the crew takes on so many responsibilities and because they have been "promoting" their underlings, there's no real way around the issue. Actually, it really helps fill in a some very sparse articles. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:37, 19 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
***Very good so far! You should also post it on www.fanfiction.net. I have my own story there but I'm rewriting it to make it better. [[User:Jason Garrick|Jason Garrick]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
== :) == |
|||
== Your theory on Mr. Bennet's name. == |
|||
Thanks your help,I use Altavista translations to glance over WIKI now,Sometimes uses the online translation. |
|||
Where did you come up with your theory and why do you think that HRG stands for something other than what is known to be true. Tim Kring's original script for the pilot listed this character's name only as "H.R.G." — standing for Horn-Rimmed Glasses. Bennet was also referred to on posting boards as "HRG" before he was given a name. |
|||
*Oh, it's just one of those fun little theories. See the theories for [[Theories:Miscellaneous#Waffle|waffles]]. :) [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 22:15, 27 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Well in that case Mr. Bennet is actually a transexual shape-shifter from the planet Opulon-7 and HRG is a typo his name is supposed to be Hug. It is fun to make up stuff with no valid reasoning. |
|||
*Go ahead and add that if you want. :) [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 22:43, 27 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
== Profanity == |
|||
== Good times, noodle salad == |
|||
* Please keep profanity out of the edit summaries. Thanks. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 14:30, 25 January 2008 (EST)) |
|||
Glad you like the quote ... It's from ''As Good as It Gets'' -- great underrated Jack Nicholson line. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:59, 30 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** Sorry. He just annoys me so ****ing much. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 14:31, 25 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
*Actually, I believe Jack was in character as Melvin Udall when he said it. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:27, 30 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*** Yeah, it's childish of him. Oh well. Just alert me to any vandalism. I usually see it pretty quickly anyway. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 14:33, 25 January 2008 (EST)) |
|||
== |
== Patroller == |
||
Huhu, I feel you a little bit... stressed! That's coooooooooooooooooooool! :) Don't worry, be happy ! :) What Citizen did is useless but not a matter, admins will delete the page/file ! We should celebrate users contributions, good or bad! :P </useless post> -- [[User:FrenchFlo|'''FrenchFlo''']] [[User talk:FrenchFlo|<span style="font-size:8pt">(talk)</span>]] <span style="border: 1px solid black">[[Wikipedia:Toulouse|<span style="background-color:blue"> </span><span style="background-color:white"> </span><span style="background-color:red"> </span>]]</span> 20:26, 30 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* I made you a patroller. You've done a good job in the past of keeping an eye on edits. Keep up the good work. :) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 22:19, 9 February 2008 (EST)) |
|||
== Image sources == |
|||
**Agree. Let us know if you have any questions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:22, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
* Yay! :D So, how do I mark an edit as patrolled? I read about little ! next to edits on recent changes, but I can't click them. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 22:24, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
** You might need to refresh, or even log out and log back in. All edits from today have been taken care of, so you might want to [http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges&hidepatrolled=1&limit=200 click "Hide patrolled edits"]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:26, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
*** Congrats and welcome aboard the patrollers group. :) Currently, there are still a large portion of my edits unpatrolled. If you don't see any, click the 30 day option and to hide patrolled edits. Then, click on the link for the diff (or the article itself if no diff). Click [mark this article as patrolled] if it's okay; or edit it and then mark it or vice versa.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 23:14, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
****Damn, that is a lot. I may need to get a second mouse. :P --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 23:20, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
***** There's no rush especially on the older ones. Usually, though not always, mistakes with older edits are caught when people check out pages after more recent edits. Just make sure to examine each edit before patrolling it and to focus on more recent ones because that's where mistakes are more likely. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:24, 9 February 2008 (EST)) |
|||
****** Is there way to permanently hide patrolled edits on Recent Changes? It's a bit annoying that I constantly have to click "Hide patrolled edits" every time I go back to recent changes. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 23:26, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
******* I don't think so, no. Unless you bookmark the URL Ryan provided above and just use that to get to the recent changes each time. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:28, 9 February 2008 (EST)) |
|||
******* Yeah, that's a good suggestion since there's no option in preferences to do that. Another option is to copy the link once you got the recent changes how you like them, then paste the url into your userpage. A toolbar link that displays a custom "Patrol changes" link only for administrators and patrollers group members is probably possible, not sure.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 23:37, 9 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
******* I use Firefox, which is a tabbed browser. My first tab is almost always recent changes. I get the page to look how I want (hide my edits, hide edits made to theory pages, show only unpatrolled edits, whatever you want, though I usually look at everything). Then I start looking at each edit from the bottom up, and I do that by opening each edit in a new tab (Ctrl+click, though Shift+click works to open each edit in a new window if you don't have a tabbed browser). After I get to the top of the recent changes page, I click the date (it says "Show new changes starting from [DATE]) which will show me only the edits made ''after'' I originally opened the recent changes page. It's really quite nice, and doing so keeps whatever format changes you've made to RC (like hiding patrolled edits). Then I just repeat the patrolling process, starting at the bottom of the new RC page and head to the top. It sounds like a lot, but it's really pretty automatic once you get the hang of it. Let me know if you need me to explain more; I can do screencaps if you're not familiar with some of the options I mentioned. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 08:32, 10 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
******** It looks like you're getting the hang of patrolling. Do you have any questions about any of the shortcuts, tricks, and tips? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:38, 10 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
********* Nope. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 22:44, 10 February 2008 (EST) |
|||
== Talk page fix. == |
|||
Hey, Heroe ... Don't forget to add a source for those [[:Image:Chameleon.jpg|last]] <nowiki>[[:Image:Cheetah.jpg|three]]</nowiki> [[:Image:Dimensions.gif|images]] you uploaded. Thanks! — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 10:13, 1 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*Ok! [[User:Heroe|<span style="color=green;">Heroe</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 10:14, 1 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
**I added nowiki code to the third image in Ryan's post because it was causing an entry on [[Special:Wantedpages|the wanted articles page]] now that the image has been deleted. [[User:Coffeeicecream|Coffeeicecream]] 09:24, 6 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
THANK YOU! --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 23:45, 1 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
==Weird sig== |
|||
* You're welcome. :) --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 11:05, 2 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Huh. Whenever I type my sig, it comes out as purple instead of green. [[User:Heroe|<span style="color=green;">Heroe</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 11:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*That's because you don't have your span set up correctly. You have <nowiki>[[User:Heroe|<span style="color=green;">Heroe</span>]]</nowiki>, and it should be <nowiki>[[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe</span>]]</nowiki> which will result in this: [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe</span>]]. All ya gotta do is take out the equal sign and replace it with a colon. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:01, 1 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
== |
== Patrolling guidelines == |
||
Hey, Heroe. As we approach the start of a new season and what promises to be a very busy time on the wiki, I suggested some tips for patrolling [[Heroes Wiki talk:Patrollers#Guidelines for patrolling|here]]. Check them out when you get a chance. Thanks! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:57, 19 September 2008 (EDT) |
|||
... is also a favorite of mine. One of my email addresses starts "superfluousjunk". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 23:11, 2 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* The problem is, you can never use the word "superflous" in a sentence without it seeming superflous. :) [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 22:02, 4 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** Here's it used in a sentence, "The third '''u''' in "superfl'''u'''ous" is not superfluous." ;) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 22:07, 4 April 2007 (EDT)) |
|||
== When you revert, you need to say why == |
|||
== Spoilers == |
|||
Spoilers do in fact need to be confined to ''only'' [[:Category:Spoilers|spoiler articles]]. See [[Help:Spoilers]].--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 19:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* But don't we allow information from promos, which are techically spoilers? [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 20:16, 12 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** Right now, the only references to anything not canon are interviews with the writing staff to explain anything that has taken place. I was tempted to leave in a few Kring interview references, but they referred to "future episodes" or "we will see", so I left those out.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 20:18, 12 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** No. Still spoilers. Still only belong in spoiler articles. Spoiler articles have their own Fan Theories sections for just this reason.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 20:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** I don't think any promo info is included on any non-spoiler article--but if it is, it should be removed. That said, people often base their theories on promos and spoilers, and I don't see anything wrong with that, so long as it's not blatantly quoting a spoiler or using a promo as a source. For instance, there's a big difference between saying "Micah will help Mr. Linderman. || None || Linderman might be aware of Micah's power since his mother is already in cahoots with Linderman." and "Micah will help Mr. Linderman. || Micah is seen in a preview talking with Linderman. || Micah has the power to manipulate technology, and Kristin Veitch said that Linderman will need somebody to rig his voting booths." — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:43, 12 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Especially if you are reverting on a theory page, where users may speculate. It is not appropriate to remove text just because you don't like the theory on a theory page. If you don't leave a comment as to why it just means editing wars.--[[User:Bradtem|Bradtem]] 22:09, 24 September 2008 (EDT) |
|||
== Parodies == |
|||
*All I did was fix capitalization errors and put something of mine that someone removed back. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 11:48, 25 September 2008 (EDT) |
|||
== Existential crisis == |
|||
So the red link you have on your user page is "Parodies and References to Heroes in other works". Good idea for a page, though I'm not exactly sure we have enough for one...yet. The "References" shouldn't be capitalized. And actually, ''if'' we're going to make the page, it should probably just be "parody" or "parodies", so that it's a bit more user-friendly. But I'd wait until we see a bit more. For instance, ''[[Zeroes]]'' is a great parody, but really deserves its own page. Just my thoughts. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 13:01, 13 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
May you recover quickly. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:16, 2 December 2008 (EST) |
|||
* I also hope you recover quickly. When you return, you may want to contribute to [[Talk:Deveaux Society]]; do you still consider it a potential spoiler?--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 23:19, 13 December 2008 (EST) |
|||
== |
== Welcome back! == |
||
What's your objection to the word "astounding" on [[User:Melloasjello|Melloasjello]]'s page? In any case, I think we're better off leaving other people's user pages as they are, rather than putting words in their mouths.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 17 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* Sorry, I'm kinda OCD when it comes to proper word useage. <eye twitches> [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:48, 17 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
** But ... there's nothing wrong with "astounding".--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*** Er, yeah. I'm confused. And a smidge irritated as well, frankly. [[User:Melloasjello|Melloasjello]] 11:22, 21 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
**** Right. As I said, editing other people's user pages = not cool. I don't even fix typos (let alone change people's word choice for no apparent reason) on other people's user pages; it's supposed to be their space.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 12:27, 21 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Hey there! Haven't seen you around in awhile... -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:58, 11 February 2009 (EST) |
|||
== Timeline article template == |
|||
* Yeah. To be honest, I was disappointed with Villains so I stopped watching for a while. But the newest episode was pretty good, so I think I'll go back to being a regular editor. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 21:00, 11 February 2009 (EST) |
|||
** Cool. Have you been keeping up with the [[graphic novels]]? You might also want to check out the [[webisodes]] or even the [[iStory]] if you haven't done so already... -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:03, 11 February 2009 (EST) |
|||
***Nope. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 20:35, 12 February 2009 (EST) |
|||
== GB departure == |
|||
It was discussed on the timeline talk page that with the new timeline setup, the timeline article template is obsolete. By putting the section link in the event infobox (plus the fact that you cannot automate the link to a specific part of the timeline), the events don't really need the template.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 11:16, 23 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*Oh.... [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 11:19, 23 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
**Also, is it currently exists, it links to a non-existent section on the [[Timeline]] article...--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 13:12, 23 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
== [[:Category:Heroes Wiki Contributor]] == |
|||
User Gabriel Bishop is considering leaving Heroes Wiki, please add your signature to this petition in an attempt to convince him to stay. [[User:Danko/GB'sPetition]] |
|||
I wonder if we're being too liberal in calling people Heroes Wiki Contributors when they're really not. Not that it really matters one way or the other to me since I don't use the category, but I do think that somebody should at least make one contribution to the site before they have that category applied. (See [[Special:Contributions/WarthenMan|here]] and [[Special:Contributions/Alexnikasios|here]], for instance.) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:22, 23 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
--{{User:Danko/Signature}} 09:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT) |
|||
== Main Page == |
|||
*I'm guessing it's too late to do anything about this. :). --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 21:43, 22 September 2009 (EDT) |
|||
==[[User:Cockney Heroes/Competition|Cockney Heroes Competition Two]]== |
|||
* Concerning the [[Main Page]], what specifically appears messed up to you? ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 12:18, 28 April 2007 (EDT)) |
|||
As you may know, [[User:Cockney Heroes/The Team|a group of Heroes-Wiki-Users]] are writing a fan fiction called. We are happy to announce a second Cockney Heroes competition. In this competition you will have to create a character and an ability. If you have not been reading Cockney Heroes, a portal of all of the episodes are [[User:Cockney Heroes/Episodes|here]] and there is a series similar to the graphic novels for Cockney Heroes, [[User:Cockney Heroes/Origins|here]]. We would like you to try out as we think that you would be a great inspiration for the team :) Thank You, we hope very much that you will enter If you need to know anything see [[User talk:Cockney Heroes#Competition Interest...|here]], we will try to respond as soon as possible. --{{User:Irony/Signature}} 16:48, 29 June 2009 (EDT) |
|||
**Everything appears as red links. [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 12:19, 28 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
==User:Blood69/Apology== |
|||
***What happens when you click on the red links? Do you get the article or does it say the article doesn't exist yet? Does it happen with articles other than the main page and are you able to test it using multiple browsers? ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 13:02, 28 April 2007 (EDT)) |
|||
Sorry about delete the Ando parentage theory. Its just that Kimiko is dating Ando, so incest and all. Sorry about that. |
|||
**** It says the article doesn't exist yet, but it seems to have been fixed now. [[User:Heroe|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 13:12, 28 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
*It's OK. Some crazy theories swirl around here. Just look at [[Theory:Mr. Muggles]]. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 23:46, 24 September 2009 (EDT) |
|||
== Congratulations == |
|||
== <i>Heroes</i> as allegory for Hindu myth == |
|||
Your [[User talk:Mc hammark/Aptitude test|application]] has been accepted. We send our apologies for the lateness of this reply, we have been [[Samuel Sullivan|rather busy]]. |
|||
<p>I don't know where to post this, so I hope you'll excuse my edit. From the reading I've done both at university and in the four years since, it is clear to me that Heroes is a very specific type of allegory, and [[Five Years Gone]] only confirms this for me. A few terms to consider: <i>Rama</i>, <i>Ravana</i>, <i>Navratras</i>, <i>Akashic Records</i>, <i>cosmic involution</i>, <i>Chakra</i>. There are two moments in [[Five Years Gone]] which are absolutely convincing for me: first, the fact that [[Niki Sanders]] and [[Peter Petrelli]] are romantically involved, five years later; second, and most importantly, that when [[Sylar]] and [[Peter Petrelli]] meet in the hallway at the end of the episode, [[Sylar]] invokes <i>Manipur Chakra</i> and [[Peter Petrelli]] invokes <i>Svadhistan Chakra</i> to counter it.</p><p>On another random [[Heroes]] blog, I mentioned that it would be quite useful to attempt to categorize the heroes into sub-classes based on the elemental manifestations of their powers; I'll finish this edit by listing the six <i>Chakras</i>, into which each hero we've seen can be classified:</p><ul><li><i>Muladhara</i>: earth element, associated with the number 56</li><li><i>Manipur</i>: water element, associated with the number 52</li><li><i>Svadhistan</i>: fire element, associated with the number 62</li><li><i>Anhata</i>: air element, associated with the number 54</li><li><i>Visudhi</i>: ether element (think [[Hana Gitelman]], [[Micah]]), associated with the number 72, and</li><li><i>Ajna</i>: mind element (think [[Matt Parkman]], [[The Haitian]]), associated with the number 64.</li></ul><p>The numbers associated with the elements are said to be the number of cosmic 'rays' necessary to cause that element to invoke its cosmic involution. How many rays are there in total? <b>360</b>. Like a circle. It's the universal <i>sakti</i> -- the number of creation.</p> |
|||
:Head of recruitment, |
|||
[[Greg Beeman]] has confirmed at least part of this; it's not some crackpot theory. |
|||
::[[User:Mc hammark|Mc hammark]] |
|||
[[User:Lander|Lander]] 18:05, 1 May 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:05, 15 January 2010
- Archive 1:Nov 2006-Mar 2007
- Archive 2:Mar-May 2007
- Archive 3:May-July 2007
- Archive 4:July-December 2007
Type of Pyramid
I think the type of pyramid (pointed top) is relevant as to whether it is Egyptian or not. Am I missing something?--MiamiVolts (talk) 20:00, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- The theory was that the pyramid was important. The note pointed out that the style of pyramid was Egyptian, which isn't supporting the theory. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 20:10, 18 December 2007 (EST)
- Ah, ok.--MiamiVolts (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2007 (EST)
Thanks
Hey, Thanks for the name suggestion. I wonder why I never came up with that? (*.*)? -- Helix of Chaos (talk) 01:18, 21 December 2007 (EST)
Name meaning
I've been asked this quite a bit, so I have it all rehearsed, lol. It breaks into The-Requiem-Bell-Is-Here. I went through an emo phase that still lingers, so I've kept it on. A requiem is a funereal mass and the church bell is one of the main instruments used. It's also a line from the Haunted Mansion ride at Disney World! (Albeit warped a little). Therequiembellishere 19:29, 29 December 2007 (EST)
- Go cut youself emo. Haha no. :P --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 20:35, 29 December 2007 (EST)
Happy Birthday
Happy birthday, Heroe! =) --Ice Vision (talk) 13:40, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- Happy birthday!--MiamiVolts (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- Thanks guys. :) --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 14:25, 30 December 2007 (EST)
fanfiction
- Hey Heroe, have you ever thought about writing fanfiction? Cause you've put several characters on the chart and I think you could make a really good story! They sound very cool. If you ever want to make one, I could help you out. :) Jason Garrick 22:43, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Thank you. I wrote a few chapters of a super powers novel. You can read the here, if you can stand going through all the pages. I'm also a member of a Heroes RPG on the same forum, which I consider somewhat fan fiction. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:03, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Very good so far! You should also post it on www.fanfiction.net. I have my own story there but I'm rewriting it to make it better. Jason Garrick 20:14, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Thank you. I wrote a few chapters of a super powers novel. You can read the here, if you can stand going through all the pages. I'm also a member of a Heroes RPG on the same forum, which I consider somewhat fan fiction. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:03, 7 January 2008 (EST)
:)
Thanks your help,I use Altavista translations to glance over WIKI now,Sometimes uses the online translation.
Profanity
- Please keep profanity out of the edit summaries. Thanks. (Admin 14:30, 25 January 2008 (EST))
- Sorry. He just annoys me so ****ing much. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 14:31, 25 January 2008 (EST)
- Yeah, it's childish of him. Oh well. Just alert me to any vandalism. I usually see it pretty quickly anyway. (Admin 14:33, 25 January 2008 (EST))
- Sorry. He just annoys me so ****ing much. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 14:31, 25 January 2008 (EST)
Patroller
- I made you a patroller. You've done a good job in the past of keeping an eye on edits. Keep up the good work. :) (Admin 22:19, 9 February 2008 (EST))
- Agree. Let us know if you have any questions. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Yay! :D So, how do I mark an edit as patrolled? I read about little ! next to edits on recent changes, but I can't click them. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 22:24, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- You might need to refresh, or even log out and log back in. All edits from today have been taken care of, so you might want to click "Hide patrolled edits". -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Congrats and welcome aboard the patrollers group. :) Currently, there are still a large portion of my edits unpatrolled. If you don't see any, click the 30 day option and to hide patrolled edits. Then, click on the link for the diff (or the article itself if no diff). Click [mark this article as patrolled] if it's okay; or edit it and then mark it or vice versa.--MiamiVolts (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Damn, that is a lot. I may need to get a second mouse. :P --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:20, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- There's no rush especially on the older ones. Usually, though not always, mistakes with older edits are caught when people check out pages after more recent edits. Just make sure to examine each edit before patrolling it and to focus on more recent ones because that's where mistakes are more likely. (Admin 23:24, 9 February 2008 (EST))
- Is there way to permanently hide patrolled edits on Recent Changes? It's a bit annoying that I constantly have to click "Hide patrolled edits" every time I go back to recent changes. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- I don't think so, no. Unless you bookmark the URL Ryan provided above and just use that to get to the recent changes each time. (Admin 23:28, 9 February 2008 (EST))
- Yeah, that's a good suggestion since there's no option in preferences to do that. Another option is to copy the link once you got the recent changes how you like them, then paste the url into your userpage. A toolbar link that displays a custom "Patrol changes" link only for administrators and patrollers group members is probably possible, not sure.--MiamiVolts (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- I use Firefox, which is a tabbed browser. My first tab is almost always recent changes. I get the page to look how I want (hide my edits, hide edits made to theory pages, show only unpatrolled edits, whatever you want, though I usually look at everything). Then I start looking at each edit from the bottom up, and I do that by opening each edit in a new tab (Ctrl+click, though Shift+click works to open each edit in a new window if you don't have a tabbed browser). After I get to the top of the recent changes page, I click the date (it says "Show new changes starting from [DATE]) which will show me only the edits made after I originally opened the recent changes page. It's really quite nice, and doing so keeps whatever format changes you've made to RC (like hiding patrolled edits). Then I just repeat the patrolling process, starting at the bottom of the new RC page and head to the top. It sounds like a lot, but it's really pretty automatic once you get the hang of it. Let me know if you need me to explain more; I can do screencaps if you're not familiar with some of the options I mentioned. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 08:32, 10 February 2008 (EST)
- It looks like you're getting the hang of patrolling. Do you have any questions about any of the shortcuts, tricks, and tips? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2008 (EST)
- Nope. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 22:44, 10 February 2008 (EST)
- It looks like you're getting the hang of patrolling. Do you have any questions about any of the shortcuts, tricks, and tips? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2008 (EST)
- Is there way to permanently hide patrolled edits on Recent Changes? It's a bit annoying that I constantly have to click "Hide patrolled edits" every time I go back to recent changes. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- There's no rush especially on the older ones. Usually, though not always, mistakes with older edits are caught when people check out pages after more recent edits. Just make sure to examine each edit before patrolling it and to focus on more recent ones because that's where mistakes are more likely. (Admin 23:24, 9 February 2008 (EST))
- Damn, that is a lot. I may need to get a second mouse. :P --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:20, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Congrats and welcome aboard the patrollers group. :) Currently, there are still a large portion of my edits unpatrolled. If you don't see any, click the 30 day option and to hide patrolled edits. Then, click on the link for the diff (or the article itself if no diff). Click [mark this article as patrolled] if it's okay; or edit it and then mark it or vice versa.--MiamiVolts (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- You might need to refresh, or even log out and log back in. All edits from today have been taken care of, so you might want to click "Hide patrolled edits". -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)
Talk page fix.
THANK YOU! --SacValleyDweller (talk) 23:45, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
- You're welcome. :) --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 11:05, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Patrolling guidelines
Hey, Heroe. As we approach the start of a new season and what promises to be a very busy time on the wiki, I suggested some tips for patrolling here. Check them out when you get a chance. Thanks! -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:57, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
When you revert, you need to say why
Especially if you are reverting on a theory page, where users may speculate. It is not appropriate to remove text just because you don't like the theory on a theory page. If you don't leave a comment as to why it just means editing wars.--Bradtem 22:09, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
- All I did was fix capitalization errors and put something of mine that someone removed back. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 11:48, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
Existential crisis
May you recover quickly. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2008 (EST)
- I also hope you recover quickly. When you return, you may want to contribute to Talk:Deveaux Society; do you still consider it a potential spoiler?--MiamiVolts (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2008 (EST)
Welcome back!
Hey there! Haven't seen you around in awhile... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)
- Yeah. To be honest, I was disappointed with Villains so I stopped watching for a while. But the newest episode was pretty good, so I think I'll go back to being a regular editor. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 21:00, 11 February 2009 (EST)
- Cool. Have you been keeping up with the graphic novels? You might also want to check out the webisodes or even the iStory if you haven't done so already... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2009 (EST)
- Nope. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 20:35, 12 February 2009 (EST)
- Cool. Have you been keeping up with the graphic novels? You might also want to check out the webisodes or even the iStory if you haven't done so already... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2009 (EST)
GB departure
User Gabriel Bishop is considering leaving Heroes Wiki, please add your signature to this petition in an attempt to convince him to stay. User:Danko/GB'sPetition
-- By Danko CH 09:06, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
- I'm guessing it's too late to do anything about this. :). --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 21:43, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
Cockney Heroes Competition Two
As you may know, a group of Heroes-Wiki-Users are writing a fan fiction called. We are happy to announce a second Cockney Heroes competition. In this competition you will have to create a character and an ability. If you have not been reading Cockney Heroes, a portal of all of the episodes are here and there is a series similar to the graphic novels for Cockney Heroes, here. We would like you to try out as we think that you would be a great inspiration for the team :) Thank You, we hope very much that you will enter If you need to know anything see here, we will try to respond as soon as possible. --IronyUTC CH 16:48, 29 June 2009 (EDT)
User:Blood69/Apology
Sorry about delete the Ando parentage theory. Its just that Kimiko is dating Ando, so incest and all. Sorry about that.
- It's OK. Some crazy theories swirl around here. Just look at Theory:Mr. Muggles. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 23:46, 24 September 2009 (EDT)
Congratulations
Your application has been accepted. We send our apologies for the lateness of this reply, we have been rather busy.
- Head of recruitment,