This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Production errors: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
imported>Chrisyu357
imported>SacValleyDweller
Line 50: Line 50:
== Molly's ADR ==
== Molly's ADR ==
* I like this article. It needs work, but a centralised location for all these seems merited. However, re: Molly's line being dubbed--if we note every instance in which dialog is ADR'd, this page is going to be fifty pages long. That's the nature of the film/TV industry; you can't always uses the audio from the scene. Now, if her line is dubbed in and her lips aren't moving, well, then that's a gaffe. But merely dubbing in a line--that's just the nature of the medium.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 12:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)
* I like this article. It needs work, but a centralised location for all these seems merited. However, re: Molly's line being dubbed--if we note every instance in which dialog is ADR'd, this page is going to be fifty pages long. That's the nature of the film/TV industry; you can't always uses the audio from the scene. Now, if her line is dubbed in and her lips aren't moving, well, then that's a gaffe. But merely dubbing in a line--that's just the nature of the medium.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 12:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)

== *bump* to stimulate discussion delete or no. ==

do we delete this whilst we perform this strike-hiatus-induced spring cleaning? Personaly I dont think this is needed, for one, I didnt notice them, and for two, they dont mean anything to the story.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:50, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 05:50, 21 January 2008

I don't think these page needs to be deleted. It just needs better goofs. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 22:05, 28 November 2007 (EST)

  • I think there are too few and they are of too little significance to be at all consequential. the iMac note can easily be placed here. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 22:09, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Brain Dump

I'm not ready to endorse or oppose this article, but here's a list of bloopers or things that may be considered for this article off the top of my head. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Here are some more:

06:37, 7 December 2007 (EST)

    • Oh don't forget Nathan's press conference that is just hilarious. Random guy 07:45, 7 December 2007 (EST)
      • If you're referring to the fact that the promo pic is not the same as the episodic pic, that's not a blooper. The promo pics are not canon and do not necessarily have to have the same elements as the aired episodes. Same goes for previews and press releases. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2007 (EST)
        • Oh well then, that is not at all as funny, I thought the reason we had it was because it was in the episode. I did not realize that one was a promotional pic. oops...
  • Oh, and the armed robber's license!
  • Tamara Greeer
  • Burnt Toaster

Maybe retitle this page...

Curiosities. (or something to that effect.) Why? Some of these aren't bloopers, but product placements or unexplained details. Maybe make this into sections like: "Real Life Inconsistencies"(for things like the iMac and Heavenly Sword), "Prop Errors" (like the backwards symbol or Peter's gender), etc?--Riddler 22:41, 28 November 2007 (EST)

  • It definitely needs a name change. I'd rather go with a couple of different names in the title, like "Bloopers, production gaffes, and continuity errors" with redirects as needed. But I don't have too strong an opinion on this one... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2007 (EST)
    • That seems like a good idea. I wasn't sure what to name it, IMDB use the word goof instead of bloopers, so perhaps it's a better choice. --Jasonm 22:39, 29 November 2007 (EST)
    • Howabout "nitpicks"? That covers all sorts of errors, inconsistencies, bloopers, flubs, gaffes, etc., while making clear that it's meant with love. C.F. Nitpicker's guides in print.--Hardvice (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Molly's ADR

  • I like this article. It needs work, but a centralised location for all these seems merited. However, re: Molly's line being dubbed--if we note every instance in which dialog is ADR'd, this page is going to be fifty pages long. That's the nature of the film/TV industry; you can't always uses the audio from the scene. Now, if her line is dubbed in and her lips aren't moving, well, then that's a gaffe. But merely dubbing in a line--that's just the nature of the medium.--Hardvice (talk) 12:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)

*bump* to stimulate discussion delete or no.

do we delete this whilst we perform this strike-hiatus-induced spring cleaning? Personaly I dont think this is needed, for one, I didnt notice them, and for two, they dont mean anything to the story.--SacValleyDweller (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://heroeswiki.ddns.net/index.php?title=Talk:Production_errors&oldid=316656"