This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Production errors

From Heroes Wiki
Revision as of 10:33, 19 February 2008 by imported>Ryangibsonstewart (Brain Dump)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I don't think these page needs to be deleted. It just needs better goofs. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 22:05, 28 November 2007 (EST)

  • I think there are too few and they are of too little significance to be at all consequential. the iMac note can easily be placed here. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 22:09, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Brain Dump

I'm not ready to endorse or oppose this article, but here's a list of bloopers or things that may be considered for this article off the top of my head. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Here are some more:

06:37, 7 December 2007 (EST)

    • Oh don't forget Nathan's press conference that is just hilarious. Random guy 07:45, 7 December 2007 (EST)
      • If you're referring to the fact that the promo pic is not the same as the episodic pic, that's not a blooper. The promo pics are not canon and do not necessarily have to have the same elements as the aired episodes. Same goes for previews and press releases. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2007 (EST)
        • Oh well then, that is not at all as funny, I thought the reason we had it was because it was in the episode. I did not realize that one was a promotional pic. oops...
  • Oh, and the armed robber's license!
  • Tamara Greeer
  • Burnt Toaster
  • Image:The power to write in thin air.jpg

Maybe retitle this page...

Curiosities. (or something to that effect.) Why? Some of these aren't bloopers, but product placements or unexplained details. Maybe make this into sections like: "Real Life Inconsistencies"(for things like the iMac and Heavenly Sword), "Prop Errors" (like the backwards symbol or Peter's gender), etc?--Riddler 22:41, 28 November 2007 (EST)

  • It definitely needs a name change. I'd rather go with a couple of different names in the title, like "Bloopers, production gaffes, and continuity errors" with redirects as needed. But I don't have too strong an opinion on this one... -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2007 (EST)
    • That seems like a good idea. I wasn't sure what to name it, IMDB use the word goof instead of bloopers, so perhaps it's a better choice. --Jasonm 22:39, 29 November 2007 (EST)
    • Howabout "nitpicks"? That covers all sorts of errors, inconsistencies, bloopers, flubs, gaffes, etc., while making clear that it's meant with love. C.F. Nitpicker's guides in print.--Hardvice (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Molly's ADR

  • I like this article. It needs work, but a centralised location for all these seems merited. However, re: Molly's line being dubbed--if we note every instance in which dialog is ADR'd, this page is going to be fifty pages long. That's the nature of the film/TV industry; you can't always uses the audio from the scene. Now, if her line is dubbed in and her lips aren't moving, well, then that's a gaffe. But merely dubbing in a line--that's just the nature of the medium.--Hardvice (talk) 12:32, 7 December 2007 (EST)

*bump* to stimulate discussion delete or no.

do we delete this whilst we perform this strike-hiatus-induced spring cleaning? Personaly I dont think this is needed, for one, I didnt notice them, and for two, they dont mean anything to the story.--SacValleyDweller (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2008 (EST)

  • I like this page and think the afd should be changed to a stub. (I also think the name of the article should be changed.) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:56, 21 January 2008 (EST)
  • I like the content as I think there are people who enjoy catching bloopers; I don't see any reason not to keep the content. I have no particular preference whether the content remains on this page or incorporated into the episode articles. If we do delete this page I think most of its content should be merged elsewhere, though. (Admin 01:00, 21 January 2008 (EST))
    • I like the page too. I'll third the suggestion to remove the afd.--MiamiVolts (talk) 01:10, 21 January 2008 (EST)
      • The only real objections I'm reading about on this page are that there aren't enough examples and that they're not significant. Well, since then, a lot of bloopers have been added. I'm sure there are a lot more examples out there, I just haven't spent more than about three minutes thinking about them. As for being insignificant, that might be true, but some people find them fun to read and quite interesting. I'll remove the afd tag now. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:15, 21 January 2008 (EST)