User talk:Hardvice

Help
General Help Characters Editing Layout Naming conventions Sources Style
Special Topics Caching Collapsible tables Consensus checks Disambiguation Images Int'l characters Interviews Quotes Portals Signatures Spoilers Tables of contents Templates Theories
For more help... Contact an administrator Admin Level Radicell RyanGibsonStewart Or leave a message Administrator Portal

Archived talk:

• October 2006 - November 2006
• December 2006
• January 2007
• February 2007
• March 2007
• April 2007
• May-October 2007

Instructions

When posting here, please use the following example syntax:

==Title of your message==
*This is your message to me. (~~~~)
**This will be my reply. (~~~~)

this will make it easier for me to keep track of conversations.

Episode Checklist

• Is it Kosher for newbies to add items to the checklist or is there a specific protocol for what can be added to the checklist? What has to happen before we can put an _X_ in an entry's blank? (NissanVersaDootDoot 23:08, 4 October 2007 (EDT))
  • The checklists are there to provide a convenient reference per episode to make sure that everything that needs to be updated gets updated. For each new episode there are a ton of things that need to be be updated like per-character episode summaries, article of the week info, the sections in the episode article itself, etc. This way one can glance over it quickly and see what's left to be done. Anything significant in an episode that will require an article can generally be added to the checklist. So if there's something important in a given episode, you want to make sure that it gets updated/created, and it fits into one of the sections already on the checklist you can add it. Marking it with an X is done when the task is taken care of (e.g. Claire is marked off once her episode summary is written and added to Claire). (Admin 23:20, 4 October 2007 (EDT))
  • And it's totally kosher for anybody to add anything that needs to be done to the checklist.--Hardvice (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Power theft cleanup

• Thanks for getting that. I must have switched up tabs when I was editing the page, so thanks.--Bob 17:07, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Timeline

When you get a chance, could you work your magic and add Template:PortalDecember2006February2007? Thanks! -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

• Since there are three months, I'm assuming we don't need to link the individual days (i.e. it should be more like Template:PortalPreeclipse than Template:PortalOctober2006)?--Hardvice (talk) 20:29, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
  • Yeah. I tried to adjust the picture of the preeclipse calendars to fit, but only one of the months was able to be adjusted. I figured I'd ask the source. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:35, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Mohinder's office

• Not sure if you noticed, but the most recent standardized version of Micah's file you uploaded is 158k. Think that could get knocked down to closer to 50k? That's about the size of the ones I uploaded and they still look good to me at 50k. (Admin 00:27, 11 October 2007 (EDT))
  • Yeah, lately my images are coming out huge. I musta knocked the quality up on my jpg compression or something. In any case, as long as all the ones you uploaded are the same size (as each other, not necessarily 450x350), we can just delete that Micah ... it's a duplicate of the one you upped.--Hardvice (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2007 (EDT)
    • Yeah, I took the time to make sure my coordinates were all the same when I was cropping, so they should all be the same. (Admin 00:43, 11 October 2007 (EDT))

Evolution Image

Tell me that the evolution image isn't crying out for a sixth figure that's flaming or just starting to take flight.

• I'm assuming you mean "flaming" as in somebody like Ted, not as in somebody, like, say, Zach? :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 11:13, 11 October 2007 (EDT)
  • Er, yea. Ted or Meredith. Flaming, not flaming. -- FissionChips 11:24, 11 October 2007 (EDT)

Sanderses'

• Could you check out Talk:The Sanderses' home? Some more discussion as to the correctness of Sanderses' that could use your input. (Admin 19:21, 14 October 2007 (EDT))

Group of 12 pic

Why not allow the composite of the several framed-screen caps stay? Yes the clarity was a little less because of the merging, but it gives us ...ALL 12...of the twelve, as the picture is without the hand overprints. We could add all the frames individually to the gallery also, but having a single picture containing all the 12 is better. --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 10/16/2007 18:29 (EST)

• Read the talk page. Somebody uploaded a better version of the composite to a different file name. There's no point in having two composites, particularly in the gallery.--Hardvice (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

t-shirt

• I assume your t-shirt did arrive, right? It got sent out a long time ago and I just want to make sure. (Admin 20:13, 16 October 2007 (EDT))
  • Oh yeah. Whoops. Sorry. I was thinking about leaving you a message to that effect and somehow convinced myself I already had.--Hardvice (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

Theories, condensed

You're always good for a hearty chuckle. Thanks. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

• Really, it's all the OMG THIS VAGUELY BROWN WOMAN MUST BE MRS. DEVEAUX / NANA / PAULETTE HAWKINS / THE SUPERSPEED AGENT / ALL FOUR AT ONCE theories that finally did it. I've been thinking of adding that section for a while, but these theories reminded me to do so.--Hardvice (talk) 23:47, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
• BTW, if you can think of any more, please feel free to expand it!--Hardvice (talk) 23:49, 16 October 2007 (EDT)