This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Luke Campbell

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

According to Ausiello, Dan Byrd plays a guy named David, not Luke. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:01, 13 December 2008 (EST)

  • If his name is David, maybe he can be David Berman. Or maybe, Dan Byrd's character will only appear in flashbacks, and he is the same David that Sylar killed in Chicago. User:ArgentinaSeeHeroes 15 December
  • Can I change it back to David then? -- Tristan0709 talk 21:37, 2 January 2009 (EST)
  • Its seems this character is an apprentice of Sylar, according to Tim Krin's interview, and the character is all excited for the fact Sylar is so evil, he wants to become one--Manwithnoname 17:26, 14 January 2009 (EST)

hey afterwards his real name is luke well at least we no longer have any confusion spoiler --Manwithnoname 17:46, 23 January 2009 (EST)

  • All I could think was "Join the dark side, Luke!" Pioto 22:49, 10 February 2009 (EST)
    • SYLAR: "Look Luke i'm your Daddy"
    • LUKE: "YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES"

--Manwithnoname 07:36, 11 February 2009 (EST)

wud sylar get luke's ability by perhaps using empathy??

  • That is actually a really interesting thought.--Crazylicious 18:20, 11 February 2009 (EST)
    • That'd be cool, but I only see it happening (at least with more certainty) if it turns out that he and Luke are related. I dont think Sylar has enough good in him to leave Luke alive in the end if he isn't. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2009 (EST)
      • He's already left Luke alive... he knew Luke had an ability, and he knew (or he believed) that Luke wasn't of any use to him. Yet he spared him. Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ U | T | C ] 21:17, 12 February 2009 (EST)
        • Sylar's still got a chance to kill him before they part ways and/or Luke becomes useless to him. Right now Luke is still usefull as he knows/thinks he knows where Sampson is. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2009 (EST)
          • To reiterate, Sylar initially believed that Luke was of no use to him. Sylar had no idea that Luke knew anything about Samson. Despite that, Sylar let Luke live. He even let his mother live. Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ U | T | C ] 22:58, 12 February 2009 (EST)
            • Im not thinking about last ep here, Im talking long term. From the top: A few eps down the line, if/when Sylar finds his father, I think it's unlikely that Sylar will let Luke live, or use the empathy pathway to absorb Luke's power if he wants it. His actions last ep, he had more incentive to let them live (what it was I cant tell you). With Luke now estranged from his mother, there will be less incentive to let him live and use empathy to absorb Microwave emision once Luke has lead Sylar to Sampson unless Luke turns out to be related to Sylar. --SacValleyDweller (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2009 (EST)
              • I don't think Sylar's so motivated by gaining power anymore. Sure, he killed Joe Macon, but what was his power? A xerox machine? It was more practical than powerful, and perhaps that's the only reason why Sylar took it. That, and Macon refused to cooperate with him. Hence why I don't think Sylar would kill Luke at all, at least not for his ability. Secondly, Sylar still has some humanity left. His emotional display at the end of Dual confirms this. I think it's entirely plausible he could develop an emotional bond with or some sort of attachment to Luke during their adventures, which would lessen his resolve to kill him. -Sincerely, Thrashmeister » talk- 10:17, 13 February 2009 (EST)
  • Hey, the previous photo of Luke was better. On the current one he looks like a "good boy". But he is a killer! Altes 12:53, 14 February 2009
  • I think he might die in Exposed (3x18) =(
  • Luke is definitely the best new character! I hope he'll stay in the show for a long time.--Alen76 15:45, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Relation to Sylar

  • It was made obvious that they have the same father in Building 26. Bloodbath 17:10, 17 February 2009 (EST)
    • No, no it wasn't. Luke was describing Sylar's father, I think he'd note if they had the same father. (which he didn't, so don't try to argue it. -- Psilaq R.- \m/ -_- \m/-
      • I agree. It would seem to obvious to make them related and although it is slightly hinted at, I doubt this will be the case. The whole family ties thing with Sylar has been strung out to much. "Look Sylar, here's your mother. But oh wait, you're a Petrelli. Haha, just kidding. here, have a kid brother." I really hope not :( Serojay 00:32, 18 February 2009 (EST)
      • He took Luke bird watching/hunting, told him about the son that he gave away, and told him where he could find him if he ever needed help. Yeah, maybe he's not his father, but there must be some relation there. And they hit at it rather heavily, not "slightly" at all. I wanted to just delete this entry that I made but someone brought it back for some reason so I guess i'll just add to it again. Bloodbath 19:36, 18 February 2009 (EST)

The Next Sylar ?

  • The only connection I could actually see with Sylar and Luke, is that Sylar sees a little bit of his old self in Luke. Luke's probably somewhat of a sociopath given he had glee when he had talked about using his power (even out in the open) and a liar as well, known for lying about this fights and Samson. Could it be possible that Luke could become geared up to be the next version of Sylar since Sylar himself seemed to have lost his ways... until the Hunger begins again. --TrueBlueBrooklynite 07:31, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Crane boy

Doesn't Luke look like an older version of the Crane boy? Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 19:23, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Talk 19:30, 22 February 2009 (EST)

    • The Crane boy was seen in the explosion future, which is 2011. The seventeen-years-old Luke would be twenty-one in 2011. Did Crane boy look that old? Altes, 11:04, 25 February 2009

When sylar told luke that his mother...

...hated him, and she said she didn't, Sylar says that he doesn't need an ability to tell that's a lie. Now, the screen doesn't shake, nor can the sound for lie detection be heard, but are we meant to think he did sense a lie or he was just saying it even if she was telling the truth? --mc_hammark 13:09, 3 September 2009 (EDT)

  • Well, in A Clear and Present Danger Martin Gray tells Sylar he abandoned Virginia after she gave birth to a child, and there was a lie detection sound effect, but the screen didn't shake. So who knows... Personally I can't see a reason for Sylar to tell Luke's words were a lie while they weren't. Or maybe not a lie, but rather Luke's wrong opinion. Green.gif AltesUTC CH
  • No, it was luke's mother who said she didn't hate luke. Maybe it was to get luke more on his side. --mc_hammark 13:18, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
    • Strange, I have an impression Sylar was referring to Luke's words, not Mary's... Green.gif AltesUTC CH
      • I don't think so. The way she says she doesn't and the look that Sylar gives her says to me that it was her that was lying. And look at the face she pulls after he says that, as though she was angry at him for exposing her true feelings. But now we're just getting off topic. --mc_hammark 13:30, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
        • Why there was no lie detection sound and visual effects... Dunno. Still, I doubt Sylar was the one lying, not Luke or Mary. Green.gif AltesUTC CH